These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5230453)

  • 21. Cost effectiveness of population screening and rescreening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 6792845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Increasing women's participation in Pap smear screening in Australia--how can we tell if the national policy is effective?
    Shelley J; Street A
    Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 10119050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Status of screening tests for cervical cancer and its precancerous lesion].
    Zhao FH; Rong SD; Qiao YL
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Dec; 23(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 12901114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Further discussion on the role of pap smear screening.
    Littell JT
    Am Fam Physician; 2000 Nov; 62(10):2232, 2235. PubMed ID: 11126851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vaginal irrigation smear technique for mass screening.
    Gutkowski TJ; Loftus JF
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1970; 20(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 4988622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of cervical cancer by irrigation smear and cervical scraping.
    Muskett JM; Carter AK; Dodge OG
    Br Med J; 1966 Aug; 2(5509):341-2. PubMed ID: 5920656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Vaginal smears in cytologic cancer screening].
    Takahashi M
    Rinsho Byori; 1965 Oct; 13(10):536-41. PubMed ID: 5894846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The status of cytologic screening of the female population of greater new orleans in 1968.
    Holmquist ND; Cucchiara RF; Hackney WP
    J La State Med Soc; 1969 Aug; 121(8):256-9. PubMed ID: 5801020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The uptake of cervical cancer screening by renal transplant recipients.
    Courtney AE; Leonard N; O'Neill CJ; McNamee PT; Maxwell AP
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Feb; 24(2):647-52. PubMed ID: 18952575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vaginal irrigation-pipette smear.
    Anderson AF; Clark FR
    Lancet; 1966 Feb; 1(7435):479-80. PubMed ID: 4159986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Defending the pap smear: a proactive approach to the litigation threat in gynecologic cytology.
    McCoy DR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S52-8. PubMed ID: 11996170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the vaginal irrigation smear technique.
    Carrow LA; Hilker RR; Elesh RH; Eggum PR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Mar; 97(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 6019928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
    Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG
    Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Pap smear: a victim of its own success?
    Steigman CK; Vernick JP
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 Aug; 34(8):8-14; quiz 14-5. PubMed ID: 12228932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The frequency and importance of gynaecological screening in older women (author's transl)].
    Kubista E; Nezbeda J
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1980 Jul; 92(14):506-9. PubMed ID: 6933742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Fitzroy Valley Pap Smear Register. Cervical screening in a population of Australian aboriginal women.
    Mak DB; Straton JA
    Med J Aust; 1993 Feb; 158(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 8450781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Low Pap smear rates leave women at risk.
    Golden WE; Hickman N
    J Ark Med Soc; 2004 Jun; 100(12):426-7. PubMed ID: 15200282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Management of abnormal cervical smears.
    Br Med J; 1980 May; 280(6226):1239-40. PubMed ID: 7388485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.