These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5235261)

  • 1. Comparative study on the marginal strengths of conventional and spherical amalgam alloys--invention of a device for the measurement of marginal strength.
    Nagai K; Ohashi M; Hasegawa K
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1967 Jun; 9(2):49-66. PubMed ID: 5235261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of marginal leakage of conventional and spherical alloy amalgams with and without stannous fluoride.
    Buonocore MG; Tani Y
    N Y State Dent J; 1968 Nov; 34(9):541-9. PubMed ID: 5245973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strength properties of a conventional and a spherical particulate amalgam alloy.
    Roydhouse RH
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1969 Jan; 35(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 5248881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Studies on Pd base ternary alloys for dental amalgam. (Part 1) Effect of size and shape of particle on dimensional change and mechanical properties (author's transl)].
    Yasumura I
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1979 Oct; 20(52):240-54. PubMed ID: 295068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies on spherical amalgam alloy in the light of dental technology.
    Nagai K; Ohashi M; Miyazu H
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1966 Dec; 8(4):149-85. PubMed ID: 5232415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Micro-hardness and compressive strength of preamalgamated and non-preamalgamated conventional and spherical amalgam alloys. A comparative study.
    Staheli PJ; Von Fraunhofer JA
    Br Dent J; 1971 Aug; 131(4):145-51. PubMed ID: 5285546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indentation creep behavior of a direct-filling silver alternative to amalgam.
    Xu HH; Liao H; Eichmiller FC
    J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 77(12):1991-8. PubMed ID: 9839787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liquid gallium alloys for metallic plastic fillings.
    Okamoto Y; Horibe T
    Br Dent J; 1991 Jan; 170(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 2001297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of polishing burs and stones on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam.
    Ribeiro SA; do Nascimento TN; Centola AL; Teixeira LC; Campos SM
    Braz Dent J; 1992; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 1290913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Flow, dimensional changes and compressive strength of silver tin fillings with the addition of tin and amine fluorides of various concentrations].
    Bettac-Mollin V; Riethe P; Steffl M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Sep; 27(9):733-8. PubMed ID: 4507324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the marginal leakage of spherical high-copper amalgam.
    House RC; Patterson MW; Pelleu GB; McCoy RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Oct; 44(4):423-5. PubMed ID: 6997472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Amalgam from high and low silver alloys.
    Shelmerdine AB; Smith DC
    Br Dent J; 1966 Nov; 121(9):407-13. PubMed ID: 5223654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [In vitro comparisons of the hardness and polishability of amalgam fillings].
    Radtke G; Pilz ME
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1983; 71(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 6224370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the polishing technique at low or high speed on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam.
    Pedigoni Mde L; Centola AL; Froner IC; Turbino ML; Ribeiro SA
    Braz Dent J; 1991; 2(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1819356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Influence of static flow (CREEP) on amalgam hardness. Effect of alloys and measured areas].
    Glavan PR; da Silva Filho FP; de Sa DN; Rettondini WC; Ababo GL; dos Santos Cruz CA
    RGO; 1990; 38(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 2218050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars.
    Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The strength of amalgam. A comparative study of test methods using various alloys.
    Basker RM; Spence D; Wilson HJ
    Br Dent J; 1973 Oct; 135(8):369-72. PubMed ID: 4518073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calcium fluoride in amalgam for caries prevention.
    Innes DB; Youdelis WV
    J Dent Res; 1966; 45(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 5216802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Friction and wear of restorative dental materials.
    Tillitson EW; Craig RG; Peyton FA
    J Dent Res; 1971; 50(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 5276330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.