These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5237668)

  • 1. Posterior restorations using Addent number 12 dental restorative.
    Strohman LI
    Dent Dig; 1968 Mar; 74(3):105-9. PubMed ID: 5237668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [On the physical chemical properties of the 3M Addent products].
    Godt H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1969 Jun; 24(6):529-39. PubMed ID: 5254382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth.
    Dietschi D; Magne P; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Oct; 25(10):659-77. PubMed ID: 9161244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior restorative materials research.
    Eichmiller FC; Marjenhoff WA
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):73-6. PubMed ID: 9120616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The deformation of cusps by bonded posterior composite restorations: an in vitro study.
    Causton BE; Miller B; Sefton J
    Br Dent J; 1985 Dec; 159(12):397-400. PubMed ID: 3910068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect aesthetic posterior restorations.
    Fier MA
    Dent Today; 2001 Mar; 20(3):48-53. PubMed ID: 12524867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Studies on the micromorphology of 3M Addent 35 by means of the surface scanning electron microscope].
    Riedel H; Vahl J; Hahne D
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1968 Feb; 23(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 5237582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Physical properties on posterior restorative composite resins of various consistencies].
    Sugiyama H; Murakami A; Uesugi S; Miura M; Kikuchi S
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1986; 24(4):633-42. PubMed ID: 3505065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
    Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structure and properties of methacrylate based dental restorative materials.
    Cook WD; Beech DR; Tyas MJ
    Biomaterials; 1985 Nov; 6(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 3910123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical properties of a plastic filling material (ADDENT).
    Gotfredsen C
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1969 Dec; 27(6):595-615. PubMed ID: 5262406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical behavior of posterior restorations with composite resins].
    Skouta M; Kakaboura A
    Stomatologia (Athenai); 1991; 47(5-6):296-305. PubMed ID: 1949095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Choice of restorative materials in posterior Class V cavities].
    Piccirillo P; Marra R; Belnome G
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1990; 31(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 2097973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Esthetic restorations for posterior teeth: practical and clinical considerations.
    Magne P; Dietschi D; Holz J
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Apr; 16(2):104-19. PubMed ID: 9084299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in material choice for posterior restorations in an Israeli dental school: composite resin versus amalgam.
    Ben-Gal G; Weiss EI
    J Dent Educ; 2011 Dec; 75(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 22184598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
    Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.