These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 524332)
1. Combined aortic and mitral valve replacement. A randomized study comparing the Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster disc valve. Rostad H; Simonsen S; Nitter-Hauge S Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Oct; 27(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 524332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The Bjoerk-Shiley and the Lillehei-Kaster valve in aortal position. A hemodynamic comparison]. Diggelmann UP; Krayenbühl HP; Rothlin M; Senning A Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1978 Jan; 108(3):92-7. PubMed ID: 622538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses. Brawley RK; Donahoo JS; Gott VL Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 124127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic valve replacement. A randomized study comparing the Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster disc valves. Peroperative haemodynamic evaluation and early results. Levang OW Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978; 12(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 725560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Results of valve substitution with the Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster oscillating-disc prostheses]. Casarotto D; Bortolotti U; Betti D; Chioin R; Rizzoli G; de Mozzi P; Gallucci V Minerva Cardioangiol; 1979; 27(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 471231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience with the Lillehei-Kaster cardiac valve prosthesis. Mitha AS; Matisonn RE; le Roux BT; Chesler E J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1976 Sep; 72(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 785108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time. Gersak B; Sutlic Z Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Intravascular hemolysis following prosthetic heart valve replacement: influence of type and position of artificial valves (author's transl)]. Flohr E; Bischoff KO; Hager W Z Kardiol; 1977 Jul; 66(7):394-8. PubMed ID: 899139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effect of valve type and valve function on chronic intravascular hemolysis after alloprosthetic mitral and aortic valve replacement]. Horstkotte D; Aul C; Seipel L; Körfer R; Budde T; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1983 Feb; 72(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 6845808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Four years' experience of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting-disc prosthesis. Larmi TK; Kärkölä P; Kairaluoma MI; Takkunen J Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1976; 65(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 962274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Replacement of cardiac valves with Björk-Shiley and Cooley-Cutter prostheses: a comparative study (author's transl)]. Chiariello L; Wukasch C; Cooley A G Ital Cardiol; 1977; 7(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 856658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982). Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of prosthetic heart valve replacement on the natural course of isolated mitral and aortic as well as multivalvular diseases. Clinical results in 783 patients up to 8 years following implantation of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis]. Horstkotte D; Loogen F; Kleikamp G; Schulte HD; Trampisch HJ; Bircks W Z Kardiol; 1983 Sep; 72(9):494-503. PubMed ID: 6636932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley monostrut prosthesis: a 4-year clinical experience]. Alajmo F; Perna AM; Calamai G; Nigro R; Cassai M; Montesi G; Braconi L; Borgioli A; Preziuso M; Palminiello A G Ital Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 2328857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experiences with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve in aortic and mitral valve surgery. Inberg MV; Arola M; Arstila M; Havia T; Laaksonen V; Satokari K; Wegelius U; Vänttinen E Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1976; 65(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 962273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience. Joyce LD; Nelson RM J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mitral valve replacement. A comparative clinical and haemodynamic study of the new Lillehei-Kaster and Björk-Shiley prostheses. Nitter-Hauge S; Hall KV; Froysaker T Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977; 11(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 897617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience with surgery of the heart valves. Björk VO Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1976; 65(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 962282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]