119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5245839)
1. Filtration efficiency of surgical masks: a new method of evaluation.
Rubbo SD; Abbott LR
Aust N Z J Surg; 1968 Aug; 38(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 5245839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbial filtration by surgical masks.
Dineen P
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1971 Nov; 133(5):812-4. PubMed ID: 5111118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods for testing surgical masks have limitations.
Ginsberg F
Mod Hosp; 1970 Jul; 115(1):100. PubMed ID: 5425128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The standard for the surgical mask.
Belkin NL
Am J Infect Control; 2009 Apr; 37(3):258-9. PubMed ID: 19328364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of surgical masks: the potential of resin-treated wool.
Garrow C; Stephens LJ; Ewing MR
Surgery; 1971 Jun; 69(6):881-3. PubMed ID: 4931135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A study on the microbial filtration efficiency of surgical face masks--with special reference to the non-woven fabric mask.
Furuhashi M
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1978 Mar; 25(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 343940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo protective performance of N95 respirator and surgical facemask.
Li Y; Wong T; Chung J; Guo YP; Hu JY; Guan YT; Yao L; Song QW; Newton E
Am J Ind Med; 2006 Dec; 49(12):1056-65. PubMed ID: 17096360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Costs and advantages of non-woven disposable textiles compared to traditional reusable textiles in surgical practice].
Ducel G
Soins Chir; 1983; (28-29):59-64. PubMed ID: 6555887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Disposables versus reuseables--methods to evaluate surgical drapes by ECRI.
Lavanchy C
Text Rent; 1986 Oct; 70(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 10278788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Face masks are flawed.
Neiburger EJ; Perry RP
J Ala Dent Assoc; 1991; 75(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 1856385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Bacteriological evaluation of surgical masks (author's transl)].
Gräf W; Kersch D
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1980; 171(2-3):142-57. PubMed ID: 7415661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting staff against airborne viral particles: in vivo efficiency of laser masks.
Derrick JL; Li PT; Tang SP; Gomersall CD
J Hosp Infect; 2006 Nov; 64(3):278-81. PubMed ID: 16920222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Non-woven operating drapes].
Manillier MH
Rev Infirm; 1986 Sep; 36(14):34, 37-40. PubMed ID: 3640518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How to make the switch from gauze to high filtration masks.
Ginsberg F
Mod Hosp; 1970 Sep; 115(3):124. PubMed ID: 5527920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Disposables: know what you want.
Huff S
Hosp Infect Control; 1979 Aug; 6(8):109-10. PubMed ID: 10243550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The surgical mask: are new tests relevant for OR practice?
Belkin NL
AORN J; 2009 May; 89(5):883-91. PubMed ID: 19422946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use high efficiency surgical masks.
Crow S
Hosp Infect Control; 1983 Feb; 10(2):21. PubMed ID: 10258266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Filtration efficiency of surgical face masks: the need for more meaningful standards.
Davis WT
Am J Infect Control; 1991 Feb; 19(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 2021231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The hospital market: an overview of surgical textiles--their development and current use.
Belkin NL
Text Rent; 1987 Feb; 70(6):84-8. PubMed ID: 10281170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Swab performance.
Turner TD; Puddifer M; Williams A
NATNEWS; 1975 Jan; 12(1):8, 14. PubMed ID: 1078877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
