These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5255340)

  • 1. Comparative frequency of use of the electric toothbrush and hand toothbrush.
    Muhler JC
    J Periodontol; 1969 May; 40(5):268-70. PubMed ID: 5255340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.
    Putt MS; Milleman JL; Davidson KR; Kleber CJ; Cugini M
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 3(4):95-103. PubMed ID: 12666948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and an electric toothbrush on plaque removal.
    Barnes V; Battista GW; Petrone D; Petrone ME; Chaknis P; DeVizio W; Volpe AR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S30-3; quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush.
    Grossman E; Dembling W; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 8694983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transient bacteremia induced by toothbrushing a comparison of the Sonicare toothbrush with a conventional toothbrush.
    Bhanji S; Williams B; Sheller B; Elwood T; Mancl L
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 12212870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A technical variant of the electric toothbrush].
    Grosse S; Siewert J
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1973 Feb; 23(2):126-9. PubMed ID: 4512630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The automatic toothbrush today. On the purrent status of "electric" dental care].
    Kimmel K
    Zahnarztl Mitt; 1966 Nov; 56(21):1025. PubMed ID: 5224619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The electric toothbrush. Present situation].
    van der Weijden GA; Berendsen CM; Fokker AM; van Geest JT; Kalsbeek H; König KG; van Loveren C
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 May; 101(5):174-6. PubMed ID: 11830969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient reaction to an electric toothbrush.
    McKendrick AJ; McHugh WD; Barbenel LM
    Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1971 May; 21(9):321-2. PubMed ID: 5281137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D1-4. PubMed ID: 8397835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the electric toothbrush in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a review of 5 years clinical experience with the Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover [D7].
    Warren PR; Chater B
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jul; 9 Spec No():S5-11. PubMed ID: 9002781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dentin abrasivity potential of a new electric toothbrush.
    Schemehorn BR; Zwart AC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jul; 9 Spec No():S19-20. PubMed ID: 9002783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of a counter-rotary action powered toothbrush and conventional toothbrush on plaque removal and gingival bleeding. A short term study.
    Killoy WJ; Love JW; Love J; Fedi PF; Tira DE
    J Periodontol; 1989 Aug; 60(8):473-7. PubMed ID: 2600755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of occlusal plaque removal in erupting molars: a comparison of an electric toothbrush and the cross-toothbrushing technique.
    Nourallah AW; Splieth CH
    Caries Res; 2004; 38(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 14767164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro assessment of the plaque-removing ability of hydrodynamic shear forces produced beyond the bristles by 2 electric toothbrushes.
    Hope CK; Petrie A; Wilson M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Jul; 74(7):1017-22. PubMed ID: 12931764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative effectiveness of the Interplak electric rotary toothbrush].
    De Beule F; Bercy P
    J Parodontol; 1990 Feb; 9(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 2384876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adolescents brush better with an electric toothbrush.
    Ritsert EF; Binns WH
    J Dent Child; 1967 Sep; 34(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 4166928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative laboratory evaluation of three toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1992; 3(Suppl C):C5-8. PubMed ID: 1306675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of effectiveness in interproximal plaque removal of an electric toothbrush and a conventional hand toothbrush.
    Powers GK; Tussing GJ; Bradley RE
    Periodontics; 1967; 5(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 5225738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative efficacy of the Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush vs Oral-B CrossAction toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 6-week clinical study.
    Nathoo S; Rustogi KN; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Zhang YP; Volpe AR; Proskin HM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S19-24; quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.