These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5255679)

  • 1. [A study of the dimensional stability of elastic materials used in taking of impressions].
    Modica R; Pezzoli M; Vercellino V
    Minerva Stomatol; 1969 Mar; 18(3):118-28. PubMed ID: 5255679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elastic impression materials.
    Asgar K
    Dent Clin North Am; 1971 Jan; 15(1):81-98. PubMed ID: 4923236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [EXPERIMENTAL COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DIMENSIONAL STABILITY OF 4 GROUPS OF DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS].
    BACHMANN J
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1965 Apr; 75():434-73. PubMed ID: 14280767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Studies on the physical properties and the dimensional behavior of silicone materials and impressions].
    Lenz E; Welker D
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1969 Jul; 19(7):487-501. PubMed ID: 5259807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The study of linear dimensional changes in alginate impressions].
    Gyimesi J; Hajduk A; Mandula J
    Fogorv Sz; 1973 Aug; 66(8):250-2. PubMed ID: 4581605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Surfaces of stone models made in elastic material impression. II. Stone model surfaces set against synthetic rubber impressions].
    Daito K
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Dec; 39(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 4513389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Dimensional measures of plaster samples obtained with silicone impressions (b)].
    Hoffer E; Pignanelli M
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1976; (3):5-15. PubMed ID: 1076818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional stability of a rubber impression material. The effect of storage time prior to pouring of the stone die.
    Bergman B; Olsson KA; Stenberg T
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1972 Nov; 65(11):559-68. PubMed ID: 4517212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Surfaces of stone models made in elastic material impression. II. Stone model surfaces set aginst synthetic rubber impressions].
    Daito K
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Dec; 39(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 4511611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of the in vitro accuracy of hydrocolloid and silicone impressions].
    Marten K; Bogopolsky S
    Cah Prothese; 1984 Sep; 12(47):35-68. PubMed ID: 6598760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative studies on the accuracy of dental casts obtained from elastic impression materials (author's transl)].
    Hide M
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1974 Oct; 74(10):1423-34. PubMed ID: 4532298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
    Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dimensional stability of dental impression materials following immersion in disinfecting solutions.
    Martin N; Martin MV; Jedynakiewicz NM
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):760-8. PubMed ID: 17353045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Accuracy of various types of elastic impressions. Part 1. Evaluation of the surface detail reproducibility of elastic impressions].
    Tsutsumi C
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1984 Sep; 3(5):623-35. PubMed ID: 6596749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of indirect working model. The method by the use of thiokol rubber base impression materials and silicone rubber impression materials].
    Nogawa I
    Shigaku; 1968 Dec; 56(3):396-414. PubMed ID: 5251802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experimental study on the influence of the pressure applied to the mucosa during impression taking on the form of impression surface].
    Hirai Y
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1971 Aug; 71(8):1835-69. PubMed ID: 4936913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The accuracy of stone dies made from rubber impression materials.
    Stackhouse JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Oct; 24(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 5272351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro study on the dimensional accuracy of selected materials for monophase elastic impression making.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Büchler A; Lauer HC; Hoffmann A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 11951807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.