These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5258159)

  • 1. Mastication strength with implant dentures as compared with soft-tissue-borne dentures.
    De Hernández CJ; Bodine RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1969 Oct; 22(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 5258159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masticatory force: implant dentures compared with conventional dentures.
    De Hernández CJ; Bodine RL
    Dent Clin North Am; 1970 Jan; 14(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 5262038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comminution of food with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
    Geertman ME; Slagter AP; van Waas MA; Kalk W
    J Dent Res; 1994 Dec; 73(12):1858-64. PubMed ID: 7814759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part II. Comparisons of masticatory performance.
    Garrett NR; Kapur KK; Hamada MO; Roumanas ED; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Levin S; Chen T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):632-40. PubMed ID: 9627891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of 27 mandibular subperiosteal implant dentures after 15 to 22 years.
    Bodine RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Aug; 32(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 4526196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Masticatory performance with mandibular implant-retained overdentures].
    Slagter AP; Geertman ME; Fontijn-Tekamp FA; Witter DJ; van Waas MA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Nov; 102(11):449-52. PubMed ID: 11837089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons of chewing difficulty of consumed foods with mandibular conventional dentures and implant-supported overdentures in diabetic denture wearers.
    Roumanas ED; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Kapur KK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 14714839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of maximum biting force and bone loss upon masticatory function and dietary selection of the elderly.
    Heath MR
    Int Dent J; 1982 Dec; 32(4):345-56. PubMed ID: 6761273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of mandibular ridge height on patients' perceptions with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures.
    Kimoto K; Garrett NR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 16274151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part I: Methodology and clinical outcomes.
    Kapur KK; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Roumanas ED; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Levin S; Ida R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 9597609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The psychological impact of implant-retained mandibular prostheses: a cross-sectional study.
    Humphris GM; Healey T; Howell RA; Cawood J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 7672846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An alternative procedure for completely reduced mandibular ridges.
    Baron S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Aug; 128(8):1140. PubMed ID: 9260425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Bone reaction to denture substructure implantations].
    Ritter R; Schwindling R
    Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl Gesamte; 1967 Oct; 49(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 4871419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The lower denture problem: two possible solutions.
    Stoler A
    Fla Dent J; 1985; 56(4):21-3, 24. PubMed ID: 3908151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of load transfer characteristics between bilateral and continuous mesostructure bar mandibular subperiosteal implant dentures.
    Jones S; Travis C
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(2):271-83. PubMed ID: 3519997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The oral surgeon's role in implant dentures.
    Mann F
    J Oral Surg; 1971 Nov; 29(11):799-804. PubMed ID: 4939875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of chewing movements on changing mandibular complete dentures to osseointegrated overdentures.
    Jemt T; Stålblad PA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Mar; 55(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 3514877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection patterns of dietary foods in edentulous participants rehabilitated with maxillary complete dentures opposed by mandibular implant-supported prostheses: a multicenter longitudinal assessment.
    Tajbakhsh S; Rubenstein JE; Faine MP; Mancl LA; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 24079559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures--results of preliminary prospective study.
    Harder S; Wolfart S; Egert C; Kern M
    J Dent; 2011 Oct; 39(10):656-61. PubMed ID: 21821093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part IV: Comparisons of dietary intake.
    Hamada MO; Garrett NR; Roumanas ED; Kapur KK; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Chen T; Levin S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11174679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.