These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5258264)
1. [Study of marginal fractures of amalgam restoration in the deciduous teeth. 1. Marginal angles of amalgam restoration in the deciduous molars]. Machida Y; Imanishi T; Yakushi M Shikwa Gakuho; 1969 Jun; 69(6):940-8. PubMed ID: 5258264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Marginal fracture of amalgam restoration in deciduous teeth. 2. Marginal angles of amalgam restorations in deciduous anterior teeth]. Yakushiji M; Imanishi T; Machida Y Shikwa Gakuho; 1970 Jan; 70(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 5264493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars. Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Amalgam fillings in the deciduous and mixed dentition--a post-treatment evaluation of service life and quality]. Pieper K; Beinhauer A; Redeker M Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):606-8. PubMed ID: 1817941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study. Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Approximating class II amalgam restorations for primary molars. Hill CJ Dent Clin North Am; 1973 Jan; 17(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 4508942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors producing failure of class II silver amalgam restorations in primary molars. Myers DR ASDC J Dent Child; 1977; 44(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 325041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A matrix system for class II amalgam restorations in primary molars. Gustafsson U; Magnusson B Swed Dent J; 1977; 1(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 268686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Simplified and rapid treatment of ankylosed primary molars with an amalgam and composite resin. Bonin M ASDC J Dent Child; 1976; 43(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 773976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of composite and amalgam in posterior teeth of children. Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC Dent Mater; 1987 Aug; 3(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 3481593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months. Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars. Tonn EM; Ryge G; Chambers DW ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 7002965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of amalgam restorations in deciduous teeth]. Papagiannoulis L; Patelarou N; Vougiouklakis G Odontostomatol Proodos; 1985; 39(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 3939458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of amalgam and stainless steel restorations for primary molars. Dawson LR; Simon JF; Taylor PP ASDC J Dent Child; 1981; 48(6):420-2. PubMed ID: 6946083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base. Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars. Linn J; Messer HH J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):479-85. PubMed ID: 7714419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]