119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5258734)
1. A new corneal aesthesiometer.
Larson WL
Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1969 Sep; 46(9):717-20. PubMed ID: 5258734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative clinical assessment of corneal sensation with a new aesthesiometer.
Beuerman RW; McCulley JP
Am J Ophthalmol; 1978 Dec; 86(6):812-5. PubMed ID: 736079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micropachometry: a technique for measuring the thickness of the corneal epithelium.
Wilson G; O'Leary DJ; Henson D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Apr; 19(4):414-7. PubMed ID: 7358494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of the non-contact corneal aesthesiometer and its comparison with the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.
Murphy PJ; Lawrenson JG; Patel S; Marshall J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Nov; 18(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 10070549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limit aesthesiometry.
Meurs PJ; De Jonge JP; Van den Berg H; Van Bijsterveld OP
Ann Ophthalmol; 1979 Aug; 11(8):1205-8. PubMed ID: 556148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does air gas aesthesiometry generate a true mechanical stimulus for corneal sensitivity measurement?
Nosch DS; Pult H; Albon J; Purslow C; Murphy PJ
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 28922696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Two new instruments for testing corneal sensitivity].
Gotz R
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1972 Oct; 161(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 4646943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Thickness of human cornea measured by topographic pachometry.
Hirji NK; Larke JR
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1978 Feb; 55(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 677253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Aesthesiometry of the cornea after refractive corneal surgery].
Kohlhaas M; Draeger J; Böhm A; Lombardi M; Abbondanza M; Zuppardo M; Görne M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Oct; 201(4):221-3. PubMed ID: 1453657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aesthesiometer probe tips. A photomicrographic examination.
Larson WL
Br J Ophthalmol; 1971 Nov; 55(11):786-7. PubMed ID: 5129974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A new non-contact corneal aesthesiometer (NCCA).
Murphy PJ; Patel S; Marshall J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 8762770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of corneal image-forming properties from corneal topography.
Schachar RA
Am J Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 115(5):680-1. PubMed ID: 8488929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative measurement of corneal sensitivity by asthesiometer.
Chundawat HS; Chaplot KL
Indian J Ophthalmol; 1978 Jan; 25(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 659004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Automatic refraction].
Bronner A; Dreyfuss JF
Annee Ther Clin Ophtalmol; 1980; 31():253-70. PubMed ID: 7342864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Methods of measuring sensitivity of the cornea].
OLAH I; SZABO G
Szemeszet; 1955 Jun; 92(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 13291217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [NPU-69-01, a simplified set of trial ocular lenses].
Aĭzenshtat LI; Andrianov VI; Ermoshin AP; Kashulin VA; Kuznetsov VP; Pronin IG; Terent'ev VN
Med Tekh; 1996; (4):46-7. PubMed ID: 8965670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The AP-94 device for examination of ocular refraction].
Volkov BP; Ponkratov AN; Skvortsov IuS; Tregub VP; Shmidt ER
Med Tekh; 1997; (1):47-8. PubMed ID: 9148079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Excimer lasers--a place in optometry?
Knaub J
Refract Corneal Surg; 1990; 6(5):313-4. PubMed ID: 2257252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring corneal recovery from osmotic and anoxic stress.
Wilson G; Stevenson R
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 Oct; 58(10):797-802. PubMed ID: 7304705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extent and effect of surface tilt on the data display of the EyeSys videokeratoscope.
Douthwaite WA; Pardhan S; Burek H
Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Nov; 80(11):986-93. PubMed ID: 8976727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
