These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5258825)

  • 41. [Craniofacial characters for Angle's class II malocclusion using Procrusts superimposition and multivariate statistics].
    Na B; Xu TM; Lin JX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2009 Feb; 41(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 19221569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A cephalometric comparison between Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion in adults.
    Fischer-Brandies H; Fischer-Brandies E; König A
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3860257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of class II malocclusions.
    Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 6939593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Craniomandibular Articulation in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion and Class I Normal Occlusion Subjects in North Indian Population.
    Prabhat KC; Kumar Verma S; Maheshwari S; Ahmad I; Tariq M
    ISRN Dent; 2012; 2012():312031. PubMed ID: 22957261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Biomet face and jaw anomalies].
    Dausch-Neumann D
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1971; 32(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 5292037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Lau JW; Hägg U
    Br Dent J; 1999 Feb; 186(4 Spec No):188-90. PubMed ID: 10205956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of mandible between normal occlusion and Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion samples. (A cephalometric study).
    Khatri VT; Modi AB; Parikh NH
    J Indian Orthod Soc; 1977; 9(2):7-20. PubMed ID: 296294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Analysis and comparison of dental arch symmetry between different Angle's malocclusion categories and normal occlusion].
    Nie Q; Lin J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 35(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 11780475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Roentgenocephalometric comparison between class II, division 1 and class II, division 2 malocclusion among Chinese.
    Hou LT
    Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1980 Feb; 79(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 6929893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Longitudinal study of dental arch forms, with special reference to normal and malocclusions].
    Sato A
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1989 Sep; 27(3):635-72. PubMed ID: 2641441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. IMPACT OF MALOCCLUSION OF CLASS ІІ1 ACCORDING TO ANGLE'S CLASSIFICATION METHOD ON FACIAL ESTHETICS.
    Halych LV; Halych LB
    Wiad Lek; 2021; 74(7):1600-1604. PubMed ID: 34459758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Craniofacial patterns of Japanese adults with various types of malocclusion: a counterpart analysis.
    Oka T; Kawamoto T
    J Osaka Dent Univ; 1994 Dec; 28(1-2):1-16. PubMed ID: 8935067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Craniofacial characteristics of subjects with normal and postnormal occlusions--a longitudinal study.
    Kerr WJ; Hirst D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Sep; 92(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 3477087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Comparative study of dentofacial relations with the soft tissue profile].
    Valente A; de Araujo EP; Thomazinho A; de Jesus Nunes L
    Rev Fac Farm Odontol Ribeiro Preto; 1982; 19(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 6964939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
    Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pathognomonic features of Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion: A comparative cephalometric and arch width study.
    Prasad SE; Indukuri RR; Singh R; Nooney A; Palagiri FB; Narayana V
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2014 Dec; 4(Suppl 2):S105-9. PubMed ID: 25558449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Semiologic significance of Angle's classifications].
    Coutand A
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1975; 76(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 1057228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Tooth wear patterns in subjects with class II division 1 and class II division 2 malocclusion.
    Agnani S; Bajaj K; Mehta S; Pandey L
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2019 Jul; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 34405600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Drago CJ; Caswell CW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Oct; 64(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 2231453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Roentgenocephalometric studies on normal occlusion and malocclusion among Chinese. I. Cranio-dento-facial structural variations associated with mandibular inclination in normal-bites.
    Chen KC
    Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1977 Nov; 76(11):880-96. PubMed ID: 273069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.