These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5259807)

  • 1. [Studies on the physical properties and the dimensional behavior of silicone materials and impressions].
    Lenz E; Welker D
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1969 Jul; 19(7):487-501. PubMed ID: 5259807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Laboratory studies on the suitability of silicone materials for elastic two-conponent impression taking].
    Gehre G; Hässler C; Kaplan P
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1969 Oct; 19(10):729-37. PubMed ID: 4904327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Accuracy of silicone compound impressions at undercut area].
    Okuno Y; Matsushiro H; Nishiyama A; Nagaoka E
    Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1973 Jun; 18(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 4520190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A study of the dimensional stability of elastic materials used in taking of impressions].
    Modica R; Pezzoli M; Vercellino V
    Minerva Stomatol; 1969 Mar; 18(3):118-28. PubMed ID: 5255679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Dimensional measures of plaster samples obtained with silicone impressions (b)].
    Hoffer E; Pignanelli M
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1976; (3):5-15. PubMed ID: 1076818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impressions for complete dentures using new silicone impression materials.
    Hayakawa I; Watanabe I
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 12731598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [New materials from Spofa-Dental, Prague].
    Komrska J
    Zahntechnik (Berl); 1974 Apr; 15(4):133-7. PubMed ID: 4532409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Viscoelastic properties of silicone, polysulfide, and polyether impression materials.
    Goldberg AJ
    J Dent Res; 1974; 53(5):1033-9. PubMed ID: 4528856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials.
    Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Volume changes of silicone samples].
    Prokofiew W; Przylipiak H; Dylewski E
    Protet Stomatol; 1976; 26(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 1075568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elasticity of elastometer impression materials. 11. Permanent deformation.
    Kaloyannides TM
    J Dent Res; 1973; 52(4):719-24. PubMed ID: 4515852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of 3 silicone dental impression materials.
    Hassan AK
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006 Sep; 12(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 17333804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dimensional accuracy of a newly improved silicone impression material for indirect technics].
    Mitani S; Hoashi S; Noda K; Sato G
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1973 Jun; 30(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 4520172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Experimental testing of physical properties of impression materials for edentulous jaw in various processing conditions].
    Welker D; Hopf C; Rothamel G
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1973 Oct; 23(10):725-42. PubMed ID: 4588554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques using addition silicone impression material.
    Penaflor CF; Semacio RC; De Las Alas LT; Uy HG
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 49(4):37-49. PubMed ID: 10202524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Making better fixed prosthodontic impressions.
    Christensen GJ
    CDS Rev; 1977 Aug; 70(8):22-5. PubMed ID: 334375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Basic studies on the mucoelastic properties of dynamic impression materials].
    Sekine H; Tajima T; Mizokami T; Hirai Y; Maeda Y
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1968 Jul; 68(7):1059-70. PubMed ID: 5247160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Stress and its relaxation on the impression of the silicone rubber].
    Kawakami M; Hasegawa J; Ohta Y
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1968 Jun; 6(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 5261344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.