These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5261300)

  • 1. Effect of compaction technic and mercury: alloy ratio on the adaptation of spherical alloy dental amalgam.
    Azar ES; Gardner KD; Hodson JT; Stibbs GD
    J Dent Res; 1969; 48(5):879-82. PubMed ID: 5261300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of mercury-to-alloy ratios on line angle adaptation of dental amalgam.
    Simon JF; Welk DA
    J Dent Res; 1970; 49(5):1055-9. PubMed ID: 5272088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effect of manifacturing technology on the resistance to corrosion of amalgam fillings and speed of mercury emission].
    Joska L; Mieres M; Gáspár J
    Fogorv Sz; 1999 Nov; 92(11):339-44. PubMed ID: 10628068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of alloy type on marginal adaptation and final residual mercury.
    Mitchem JC; Mahler DB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1969 Jan; 78(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 5248314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plastic deformation of the amalgam restoration as related to cavity design and alloy system.
    Galan J; Phillips RW; Swartz ML
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1973 Dec; 87(7):1395-400. PubMed ID: 4518562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Minamata convention on mercury and dental amalgam.
    Peretz B
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2014 Oct; 31(4):60. PubMed ID: 25549389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of zinc-containing and zinc-free amalgam restorations.
    Watson PA; Philips RW; Swartz ML; Gilmore HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 May; 29(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 4513306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of a lathe-cut high-copper amalgam alloy.
    Knibbs PJ; Plant CG; Shovelton DS; Jones PA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Sep; 14(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 3312541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning analysis of a dual-alloy restoration.
    Liatukas EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Apr; 31(4):435-8. PubMed ID: 4521852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influences of clinical factors on marginal adaptation and residual mercury content of amalgam.
    Mathewson RJ; Lu KH
    J Dent Res; 1975; 54(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 122832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A standardized method of controlling residual mercury in the precondensation mix.
    Rutsky PP
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1970 Jun; 80(6):1354-7. PubMed ID: 5266128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of marginal leakage of conventional and spherical alloy amalgams with and without stannous fluoride.
    Buonocore MG; Tani Y
    N Y State Dent J; 1968 Nov; 34(9):541-9. PubMed ID: 5245973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valuable clinical amalgam procedures and choices of alloys.
    Eames WB
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1978; 33(4):363-81. PubMed ID: 291077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amalgam: has junk science caused dentists to pull it?
    Giangrego E
    CDS Rev; 2006; 99(4):10-3. PubMed ID: 16903498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Width of the marginal fissure during filling depending on the mode of mixing and the type of amalgam in in vitro studies].
    Kamocka D; Mitrega J; Syryńska M
    Czas Stomatol; 1977 Sep; 30(9):705-8. PubMed ID: 269049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasons for replacement of amalgam dental restorations.
    Dahl JE; Eriksen HM
    Scand J Dent Res; 1978 Sep; 86(5):404-7. PubMed ID: 281762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modern concepts for the amalgam restoration.
    Wing G
    Dent Clin North Am; 1971 Jan; 15(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 4923234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Resistance to pressure of amalgam relative to the pressure of plugging and the alloy-mercury ratio].
    Dermann K
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 Jul; 33(7):480-2. PubMed ID: 276464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative clinical study of amalgam fillings].
    Szabó J; Herczegh B; Márk D; Tóth E; Bánóczy J
    Fogorv Sz; 1998; 91(8-9):285-91. PubMed ID: 9729672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.