These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 526190)

  • 21. Brainstem wave V latencies to tone pip stimuli.
    Weber BA; Folsom RC
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(5):182-4. PubMed ID: 856779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of rise-fall time, frequency, and intensity on the early/middle evoked response.
    Beattie RC; Moretti M; Warren V
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 May; 49(2):114-27. PubMed ID: 6716983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The sound intensity-related behaviour of the brain stem response P6 in different forms of hearing disorders.
    Lehnhardt E
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 232(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 7305724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of tone-burst frequency on fast and slow components of auditory brain-stem response.
    Takagi N; Suzuki T; Kobayashi K
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 4023602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scalp-recorded frequency-following responses in neonates.
    Gardi J; Salamy A; Mendelson T
    Audiology; 1979; 18(6):494-506. PubMed ID: 526194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to tone pips in hearing-impaired children.
    Kobayashi K; Hirabayashi M; Takagi N; Suzuki T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1985 Jul; 9(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 4030235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Furuse H; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Yokota M; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():7-14. PubMed ID: 8203246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Yamazaki Y; Yokota M; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Itoh S; Watanabe T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1996; 522():6-10. PubMed ID: 8740802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects.
    Gorga MP; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KA; Jesteadt W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 3352259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. IV. Interaural latency differences (wave V) in cochlear hearing loss.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Lindström B; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 7280543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The brain stem response SN10, its frequency selectivity, and its value in classifying neural hearing lesions.
    Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 7213193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Frequency selectivity and thresholds of brief stimuli suitable for electric response audiometry.
    Davis H; Hirsh SK; Popelka GR; Formby C
    Audiology; 1984; 23(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 6704060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. I. The variability of the normal response.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Lindström B; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 756085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 40 Hz middle latency responses to low frequency tone pips in normally hearing adults.
    Szyfter W; Dauman R; de Sauvage RC
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Oct; 13(5):275-80. PubMed ID: 6544840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 40-Hz steady-state responses in newborns and in children.
    Maurizi M; Almadori G; Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M; Luciano R
    Audiology; 1990; 29(6):322-8. PubMed ID: 2275647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of high-pass filtering on the detection of the auditory brainstem response.
    Mason SM
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Aug; 18(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 6487849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Threshold prediction from the auditory 40-Hz evoked potential.
    Lynn JM; Lesner SA; Sandridge SA; Daddario CC
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 6510584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.