These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 526197)

  • 1. Influence of amplification on the discrimination of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables in a population with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jacobson JT; McCandless GA; Mahoney TM
    Audiology; 1979; 18(6):522-36. PubMed ID: 526197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Speaks C; Niccum N; Van Tasell D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 3981993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.
    Gatehouse S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1258-68. PubMed ID: 1401514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive effects in dichotic speech testing in elderly persons.
    Hällgren M; Larsby B; Lyxell B; Arlinger S
    Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 11324841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apparent auditory deprivation in children: implications of monaural versus binaural amplification.
    Gelfand SA; Silman S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 8219298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Speech audiometry with logatomes].
    Welge-Lüssen A; Hauser R; Erdmann J; Schwob C; Probst R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Feb; 76(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 9172631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dichotic listening in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Roeser RJ; Johns DF; Price LL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 965275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: effects on consonant recognition.
    Fabry DA; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 3724111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of monaural hearing aid use on dichotic test results for individuals with high-frequency hearing impairment.
    Surr RK; Montgomery AA; Mueller HG
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 3702363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of the cued-listening task in the evaluation of binaural hearing aids.
    Jerger J; Darling R; Florin E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Sep; 5(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 7987016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dichotic lead effect of CV syllables in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Cattey TJ
    J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 7349869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonsense-syllable recognition in noise using monaural and binaural listening strategies.
    Arsenault MD; Punch JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1821-30. PubMed ID: 10089605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of voice-onset-time on dichotic listening with consonant-vowel syllables.
    Rimol LM; Eichele T; Hugdahl K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 16023155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consonant perception in quiet: effect of increasing the consonant-vowel ratio with compression amplification.
    Hickson L; Byrne D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Oct; 8(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 9328894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telephone listening ability for hearing-impaired individuals.
    Holmes AE; Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 6724177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
    Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids.
    Carter AS; Noe CM; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 11392438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ear dominance for nonsense-syllable recognition ability in sensorineural hearing-impaired children: monaural versus binaural amplification.
    Hattori H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 8219299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The right ear advantage revisited: speech lateralisation in dichotic listening using consonant-vowel and vowel-consonant syllables.
    Sætrevik B
    Laterality; 2012; 17(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 24735233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.