These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 526628)

  • 1. [Evaluation of screening for uterine cervix cancer: from theory to practice (author's transl)].
    Riotton G
    Bull Cancer; 1979; 66(4):404-6. PubMed ID: 526628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Results of the programme for cytological detection of cancer of the cervix in Berlin (R.D.A.) (author's transl)].
    Berndt H; Neuser D; Ebeling K
    Bull Cancer; 1979; 66(4):407-8. PubMed ID: 526629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cervical cancer screening in the Bas-Rhin. Evaluation of four and a half years of the EVE campaign].
    Fender M; Schaffer P; Dellenbach P
    Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():11-20. PubMed ID: 10989625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for cancer of uterine cervix and approaches adopted in India.
    Murthy NS; Mathew A
    Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):154-62. PubMed ID: 10921220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the feasibility of single lifetime PAP smear evaluation between 41-50 years of age as strategy for cervical cancer control in developing countries from our 32 years of experience of hospital-based routine cytological screening.
    Misra JS; Gupta HP; Das V
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Dec; 31(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 15540174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical cytology screening. How can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia?
    Hislop TG; Clarke HF; Deschamps M; Joseph R; Band PR; Smith J; Le N; Atleo R
    Can Fam Physician; 1996 Sep; 42():1701-8. PubMed ID: 8828873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Organization of screening programs in developing countries with reference to screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in India.
    Luthra UK; Rengachari R
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):273-88. PubMed ID: 3570411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Budukh AM; Rajkumar R
    Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(10):954-62. PubMed ID: 11693978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
    Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prevention of cervical cancer: the place of the cytological smear test.
    Hudson E
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Mar; 12(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 3888487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Screening for cancer of the cervix. Program of the Central Region of Portugal].
    da Silva DP; Real O
    Acta Med Port; 1997 Oct; 10(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 9477587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
    Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical cancer screening and management practices among providers in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP).
    Saraiya M; Irwin KL; Carlin L; Chen X; Jain N; Benard V; Montano DE
    Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 17628488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal frequency of screening for cervical cancer: a Toronto case-control study.
    Clarke EA; Hilditch S; Anderson TW
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):125-31. PubMed ID: 3570399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cytological mass screenings for the cancer of the cervix uteri. Resources, organization and costs].
    Kolstad P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1988 Sep; 108(25):2057-60. PubMed ID: 3201418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the effect of Papanicolaou screening in Sweden: record linkage between a central screening registry and the National Cancer Registry.
    Pettersson F; Näslund I; Malker B
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):91-105. PubMed ID: 3570419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.