These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Retention of orthodontic bands as influenced by the cementing media. Williams JD; Swartz ML; Phillips RW Angle Orthod; 1965 Oct; 35(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 5213517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The design of buccal canine retraction springs for removable orthodontic appliances. Houston WJ; Waters NW Br J Orthod; 1977 Oct; 4(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 274153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The difference of measurement of chin cap tension among doctors]. Miyaji T; Hiro N Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1971 Jun; 30(1):116-9. PubMed ID: 5283451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of NiTi Superelastic Retraction Coil Springs for orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Rozman J; Mrvar P; Drevenšek M; Pečlin P Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(6):339-48. PubMed ID: 21263180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A study of the concepts of "optimal" and "differential" force in orthodontic movement, by means of metallic implants (author's transl)]. Martins DR; Interlandi S; Almeida RR Ortodontia; 1978; 11(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 291876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic force in orthodontics. Blechman AM; Smiley H Am J Orthod; 1978 Oct; 74(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 281146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Indications and contraindications for removable and fixed orthodontic appliances]. Herren P SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1975 Mar; 85(3):291-308. PubMed ID: 1055463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The choice between fixed or removable orthodontic appliances]. Lautrou A Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1979; 8(6):358-60. PubMed ID: 295134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Indications and contraindications for removable and fixed orthodontic appliances]. Herren P Odontostomatol Implantoprotesi; 1975; (1):68-71. PubMed ID: 1088650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE. Wiedel AP Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removable vs fixed orthodontic appliances. Lang R Oral Health; 1975 Sep; 65(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 1074146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Indications for the use of fixed and removable orthodontic appliances. Reay WJ; Stephens CD Dent Update; 1993; 20(1):25-6, 28-30, 32. PubMed ID: 8330661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical properties of root cementum: Part 10. Comparison of the effects of invisible removable thermoplastic appliances with light and heavy orthodontic forces on premolar cementum. A microcomputed-tomography study. Barbagallo LJ; Jones AS; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 18249288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Indications for removable and fixed orthodontic appliances]. Freunthaller P Zahnarztl Prax; 1980 Mar; 31(3):91-6. PubMed ID: 6933781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]