These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5272012)
21. Effect of compaction technic and mercury: alloy ratio on the adaptation of spherical alloy dental amalgam. Azar ES; Gardner KD; Hodson JT; Stibbs GD J Dent Res; 1969; 48(5):879-82. PubMed ID: 5261300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of acid-treated Ag3Sn on the tensile strength and fracture of dental amalgam. Young FA; Wilsdorf HG J Biomed Mater Res; 1968 Sep; 2(3):401-3. PubMed ID: 5708020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Fracture strength of classes I and II amalgam restorations condensed on different cement bases. Vieira DF; Mondelli J Estomatol Cult; 1971; 5(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 5291994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Fracture strength of Class II amalgam restorations (author's transl)]. Coradazzi JL; Mondelli J Estomatol Cult; 1972; 6(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 4525849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Cuspal fracture with conventional Class II amalgam. Davis MW Dent Today; 1998 Dec; 17(12):42-4, 46-9. PubMed ID: 10752390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Mercury vapor release during insertion and removal of dental amalgam. Powell LV; Johnson GH; Yashar M; Bales DJ Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 8008614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Creep and one hour strength of dental amalgams]. Espevik S Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1977 Jan; 87(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 265062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Compression of amalgam specimens under various loads]. Dermann K Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1976 Dec; 31(12):927-9. PubMed ID: 1069636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A consideration of amalgam. Methods and instrumentarium. II. Hollenback GM J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1969; 45(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 5260409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The pressure dependence of the elastic constants of dental amalgam. Grenoble DE; Katz JL J Biomed Mater Res; 1971 Sep; 5(5):489-502. PubMed ID: 5120387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Bonding of repaired amalgam evaluated by tensile strength and scanning electron microscopic observation]. Miyata T Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Nov; (28):92-108. PubMed ID: 4576939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Amalgams. Possibilities and indication of their use]. Castagnola L; Wirz J Zahnarztl Prax; 1975 Apr; 26(7):149-50. PubMed ID: 1057334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Dental amalgams and mercury polemic in Abidjan]. Avoaka-Boni MC; Adou-Assoumou NM; Sinan AA; Abouattier-Mansilla EC Odontostomatol Trop; 2007 Dec; 30(120):7-14. PubMed ID: 18369028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cement bases under amalgam restorations: effect of thickness. Farah JW; Clark AE; Thomas PA; Borkow I Oper Dent; 1981; 6(3):82-9. PubMed ID: 6951144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of contamination by mercury and by fresh amalgam on some properties of amalgam and gold alloy. de Lima Navarro MF Estomatol Cult; 1971; 5(2):186-201. PubMed ID: 5293362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Psychological and medical effects of mercury intake from dental amalgam. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Osborne JW; Albino JE Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 10649939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]