These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5275613)

  • 1. [Practical experiences and studies of the impression material Silodent].
    Bödö J
    Fogorv Sz; 1970 Dec; 63(12):377-9. PubMed ID: 5275613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Practical experiences with Silodent, a silicon rubber impression material].
    Kemény I; Szondy I
    Fogorv Sz; 1970 Jan; 63(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 5264235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Contact allergy reactions to Silodent impression material].
    Olveti E; Hegedüs C
    Fogorv Sz; 1994 Apr; 87(4):115-9. PubMed ID: 8005320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Studies on Silodent, a Hungarian silicon rubber impression material].
    Gömöry P; Pázmányi G
    Fogorv Sz; 1970 Jan; 63(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 5264237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Practical experiences with a new model material].
    Gehrke ME
    Zahnarztl Prax; 1967 Mar; 18(5):60-1. PubMed ID: 5230884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials.
    Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Practical experience with the new impression material Impregum].
    Mossdorf M
    Odontes; 1966; 15(1):16 passim. PubMed ID: 5328344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experiences with the impression material "Impregum" in dental practice].
    Mossdorf M
    Kassenzahnarzt Colloq Med Dent; 1967; 40():6-9. PubMed ID: 5236771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproduction of details using dental stones and investment material in impressions of elastomers and waxes.
    Nilner K; Owall B
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):249-55. PubMed ID: 6963007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experiences with the double impression method (corrective impression)].
    Knoblauch M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1966 Jan; 21(1):169-70. PubMed ID: 5322606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
    Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface roughness of impression materials and dental stones scanned by non-contacting laser profilometry.
    Rodriguez JM; Curtis RV; Bartlett DW
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 19036424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: an in vitro study.
    Marafie Y; Looney S; Nelson S; Chan D; Browning W; Rueggeberg F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 19033027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wastage of a silicone impression material in a general practice setting: a comparison between hand and automixing methods.
    Wilson NH; Cowan AJ; Crisp RJ; Wilson MA
    SADJ; 2001 May; 56(5):233-6. PubMed ID: 11490695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials.
    Barghi N; Ontiveros JC
    Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.