These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Metric variations at the craniofacial level. Their occlusal relations]. Brichard M Bull Group Eur Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1976; 18(3-4):135-44. PubMed ID: 1067133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A cephalometric study of facial types and occlusion classes and relation between them in Finnish children. Haavikko K; Helle A Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1974 Jun; 70(3):99-106. PubMed ID: 4850162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A cephalometric appraisal of Chinese adults having normal occlusion and excellent facial types. Lin WL J Osaka Dent Univ; 1985 Apr; 19(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 3869214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cephalometric values in a group of school children with normal occlusion in Campania]. Ferro A; Di Nuzzo M Mondo Ortod; 1985; 10(5):27-34. PubMed ID: 3869676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphology of adult face after repair of isolated cleft palate in childhood. Farkas LG; Lindsay WK Cleft Palate J; 1972 Apr; 9():132-42. PubMed ID: 4504268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Length of the face in adults with natural teeth]. Dahl BL Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1979 Nov; 89(10):532-7. PubMed ID: 293634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Open bite]. de Lima RS Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1980; 34(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 7005995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Some effects of mandibular growth on the dental occlusion and profile. Isaacson RJ; Zapfel RJ; Worms FW; Bevis RR; Speidel TM Angle Orthod; 1977 Apr; 47(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 266388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Total maxillary advancement with and without bone grafting. Araujo A; Schendel SA; Wolford LM; Epker BN J Oral Surg; 1978 Nov; 36(11):849-58. PubMed ID: 361937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of dental and skeletal relationships from facial profiles in preschool children. Fields HW; Vann WF Pediatr Dent; 1979 Mar; 1(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 162211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cephalometry as a gauge of functional and esthetic balance in orthodontics]. Vaugeois M; Kim Khue N; Jolivet C; Seyrat M Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1981; 10(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 6945642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of 15 year old children with excellent occlusion and with crowding of the teeth, Angle Class I malocclusion, in respect of face size and shape and tooth size. Adams CP Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():11-26. PubMed ID: 6963765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Little influence on tooth position from playing a wind instrument. Rindisbacher T; Hirschi U; Ingervall B; Geering A Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 2389854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cephalometric patterns of adults with normal occlusion. Christie TE Angle Orthod; 1977 Apr; 47(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 266384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. McNamara norms for Turkish adolescents with balanced faces and normal occlusion. Kilic N; Catal G; Oktay H Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20575197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Facial esthetics in white Brazilian adolescents with normal occlusion, using the Burstone analysis]. Fismann RA; Vigorito JW Ortodontia; 1987; 20(1-2):52-64. PubMed ID: 3506995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Considerations of the soft tissues of normal occlusal subjects with good face and Tweed triangle. Iwasawa T; Moro T; Nakamura K J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1975 Mar; 17(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 1069100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]