These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The combined composite resin and amalgam restoration for posterior teeth: a clinical report. Roda RS; Zwicker PF Quintessence Int; 1992 Jan; 23(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 1631274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds? Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioaesthetic ceromer restorations for the replacement of existing posterior amalgam restorations. Ahmad I Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):416-8, 420. PubMed ID: 9655048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students. Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?]. Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior esthetic dentistry--a perspective for the new century. Neuman KA J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Nov; 65(10):556-7. PubMed ID: 10612932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The composite resin-amalgam window preparation. Nelson JA Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 4(6):21-6. PubMed ID: 1391930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Restoring esthetics and function of posterior teeth using direct composite restoration]. Samet N Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2001 Oct; 18(3-4):40-6, 110. PubMed ID: 11806046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing form and function with the direct posterior composite resin: a case report. Hornbrook DS Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 May; 8(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 9028301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis. Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Composite veneering of complex amalgam restorations. Demarco FF; Zanchi CH; Bueno M; Piva E Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 17288335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Innovations in esthetic restorations of posterior teeth using composite]. Klaiber B; Haller B Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1988 Aug; 43(8):893-9. PubMed ID: 3255590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Composite-veneered amalgam restorations. Gordon M; Laufer BZ; Metzger Z J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):759-62. PubMed ID: 3866062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations. Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The longevity of resin-based composite restorations in posterior teeth. Hondrum SO Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 11199613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]