These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5276188)

  • 21. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature.
    Sadowsky SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):433-42. PubMed ID: 17174661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally invasive management of dental caries: contemporary teaching of posterior resin-based composite placement in U.S. and Canadian dental schools.
    Lynch CD; Frazier KB; McConnell RJ; Blum IR; Wilson NH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jun; 142(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 21628682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trends in material choice for posterior restorations in an Israeli dental school: composite resin versus amalgam.
    Ben-Gal G; Weiss EI
    J Dent Educ; 2011 Dec; 75(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 22184598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations.
    Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jun; 127(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 8708275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Esthetic restorations of the posterior teeth. Interview by M. Perrier].
    Holz J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(11):1498-500. PubMed ID: 1962172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Longevity of posterior tooth dental restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Feb; 136(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 15782524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Posterior amalgam restorations--usage, regulation, and longevity.
    Mitchell RJ; Koike M; Okabe T
    Dent Clin North Am; 2007 Jul; 51(3):573-89, v. PubMed ID: 17586144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Posterior restoration using laboratory-fabricated composite resin inlays/onlays.
    Lowe E; Rego NA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 11404917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using a new condensable composite for posterior restorations.
    Poss SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S14-8. PubMed ID: 12089754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A customized acrylic resin shell for fabricating an amalgam core on the coronally debilitated, endodontically treated posterior tooth.
    Bonilla ED; Anderkvist T; Miller GD
    Quintessence Int; 1995 May; 26(5):317-24. PubMed ID: 7568753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
    Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
    Koczarski MJ
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 12680067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Resin composites in the post-amalgam age.
    Lutz F; Krejci I
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Dec; 20(12):1138-44, 1146, 1148. PubMed ID: 10850266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
    Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A combined amalgam and composite resin restoration.
    Cardash HS; Bichacho N; Imber S; Liberman R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):502-5. PubMed ID: 2338663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.