These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5279011)

  • 41. The effect of joint surface contours on the transverse strength of repaired acrylic resin.
    Harrison WM; Stansbury BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Apr; 23(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 5264829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Abrasion resistance of resins for the dental and dental technical areas].
    Sedej R; Ladic J
    Quintessenz; 1977 Dec; 28(12):133-6. PubMed ID: 297930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of the addition of poly(methyl methacrylate) beads on some properties of acrylic resin.
    Jagger DC; Harrison A; al-Marzoug K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(5):378-82. PubMed ID: 11203657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of denture cleansers on the surface roughness and hardness of a microwave-cured acrylic resin and dental alloys.
    Rodrigues Garcia RC; Joane Augusto de S; Rached RN; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Sep; 13(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 15345017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of various disinfectant solutions on the surface hardness of an acrylic resin denture base material.
    Asad T; Watkinson AC; Huggett R
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 8507335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Comparative studies on plastic material retention on facings].
    Rossbach A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1969 Oct; 24(10):861-3. PubMed ID: 5259315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of autopolymerizing acrylic resin thickness on the bond strength of a repaired denture tooth.
    Clark WA; Hsu YT
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):528-33. PubMed ID: 24889182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of beverages and mouthwashes on the hardness of polymers used in intraoral prostheses.
    Goiato MC; Dos Santos DM; Andreotti AM; Nobrega AS; Moreno A; Haddad MF; Pesqueira AA
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):559-64. PubMed ID: 24750416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In-vitro investigation on suitability of light-cured resins for interocclusal splints : part II: surface hardness.
    Danesh G; Lippold C; Ziebura T; Reinhardt KJ; Schäfer E; Ehmer U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Mar; 67(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 16570135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mechanical properties of two orthodontic adhesive materials polymerized with halogen and plasma curing.
    Mifsud S; Lagneau C; Lissac M; Grosgogeat B
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 16010035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Restorative resins.
    Phillips RW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1975 Apr; 19(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 1090460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Influence of the retention form of Class V cavities in the tensile strength of acrylic resin fillings, inserted with the pressure or with the non-pressure technic, with ages of 1 or 24 hours].
    Maltez EF; Mondelli J; Ishikiriama A
    Estomatol Cult; 1972; 6(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 4516988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison of the physical properties of four prosthetic veneering materials.
    Jones RM; Goodacre CJ; Moore BK; Dykema RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 2915331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A correlation between abrasion resistance and other properties of some acrylic resins used in dentistry.
    Harrison A; Huggett R; Handley RW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Jan; 13(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 429382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An in vitro investigation of the effect of the addition of untreated and surface treated silica on the transverse and impact strength of poly(methyl methacrylate) acrylic resin.
    Mc Nally L; O'Sullivan DJ; Jagger DC
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 16477118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Effect of the rise in temperature on the water absorption of an ethylene imine material and a direct filling acrylic resin].
    Bombonatti PE; Scaranelo RM; de Barros LE; da Silva Filho CE
    Rev Fac Odontol Aracatuba; 1975; 4(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 1076722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Coefficient of friction of prosthetic tooth materials.
    Koran A; Craig RG; Tillitson EW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Mar; 27(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 4501138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of materials and methods used in acid etch restorative procedures.
    Nelson SR; Till MJ; Hinding JH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Nov; 89(5):1123-7. PubMed ID: 4610027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Standard test methods for direct filling resins.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1967 Dec; 75(6):1426. PubMed ID: 5234126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.