These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5280240)

  • 1. A comparative sensitometric x-ray film study.
    Fleming RD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1971 May; 31(5):701-18. PubMed ID: 5280240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality control of the automatic processor.
    Legg LM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Feb; 22(2):135-8, 140-2; quiz 144. PubMed ID: 11911065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Contribution to the standardization of intraoral radiography technics].
    Erle A; Landeck E; Nenning K; Rother U; Baum A
    Stomatol DDR; 1980 Jan; 30(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 6932115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maintenance of automatic dental film processors.
    Thunthy KH
    LDA J; 1996; 55(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 9569822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Optimal dental radiography by means of expert film processing].
    Horn C
    Stomatol DDR; 1978 Oct; 28(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 282693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assurance: 2. The image receptor, the darkroom and processing.
    Horner K
    Dent Update; 1992 Apr; 19(3):120, 122-4, 126. PubMed ID: 1291369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geometric errors in measurements on x-ray films. A methodologic study on lateral model exposures.
    Krogstad O; Kvam E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1971 Jun; 29(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 5283993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the darkroom in radiograph quality control.
    Wolfgang L
    N Y State Dent J; 1998; 64(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 9707980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of radiation fog on the radiographic contrast of dental films.
    Shawkat AH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1969 Feb; 27(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 5249513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Upon the characteristics and resolution of the dental x-ray machine].
    Sugisawa K
    Shigaku; 1973 Apr; 61(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 4515198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simplified and standardized intraoral radiography with reduced tissue irradiation.
    Updegrave WJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1972 Oct; 85(4):861-9. PubMed ID: 4506940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality criteria for intra-oral roentgen images].
    Jung T
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 Jan; 43(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 2315636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absorbed radiation from panoramic plus bitewing exposures vs full-mouth periapical plus bitewing exposures.
    Jerman AC; Kinsley EL; Morris CR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1973 Feb; 86(2):420-3. PubMed ID: 4509259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mistakes in the projection of intraoral radiographs].
    Sonnabend E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1974 Mar; 29(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 4524537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Errors in automation].
    Buchmann F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1974 Mar; 29(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 4524535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of manual and automatic processing in general dental practice.
    Rout PG; Rogers SN; Chapman M; Rippin JW
    Br Dent J; 1996 Aug; 181(3):99-101. PubMed ID: 8810109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitometric properties of direct exposure dental X-ray films in relation to the characteristic curve.
    Boere G; van Aken J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 May; 19(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 2079139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.