These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5281137)

  • 1. Patient reaction to an electric toothbrush.
    McKendrick AJ; McHugh WD; Barbenel LM
    Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1971 May; 21(9):321-2. PubMed ID: 5281137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Caregivers' perceptions of electric versus manual toothbrushes for the institutionalised elderly.
    Wolden H; Strand GV; Gjellestad A
    Gerodontology; 2006 Jun; 23(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 16677184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush.
    Grossman E; Dembling W; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 8694983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of the electric toothbrush in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a review of 5 years clinical experience with the Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover [D7].
    Warren PR; Chater B
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jul; 9 Spec No():S5-11. PubMed ID: 9002781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.
    Putt MS; Milleman JL; Davidson KR; Kleber CJ; Cugini M
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 3(4):95-103. PubMed ID: 12666948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of a new electronic toothbrush in removing bacterial dental plaque in young adults.
    Galgut PN
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(5):441-5. PubMed ID: 9171045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative frequency of use of the electric toothbrush and hand toothbrush.
    Muhler JC
    J Periodontol; 1969 May; 40(5):268-70. PubMed ID: 5255340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The automatic toothbrush today. On the purrent status of "electric" dental care].
    Kimmel K
    Zahnarztl Mitt; 1966 Nov; 56(21):1025. PubMed ID: 5224619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study between the double-headed toothbrush and the single headed toothbrush in plaque removal efficiency.
    Almajed I
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 19(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 7865417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence, intensity and nature of bacteraemia after toothbrushing.
    Lucas VS; Gafan G; Dewhurst S; Roberts GJ
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):481-7. PubMed ID: 18448227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and an electric toothbrush on plaque removal.
    Barnes V; Battista GW; Petrone D; Petrone ME; Chaknis P; DeVizio W; Volpe AR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S30-3; quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transient bacteremia induced by toothbrushing a comparison of the Sonicare toothbrush with a conventional toothbrush.
    Bhanji S; Williams B; Sheller B; Elwood T; Mancl L
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 12212870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The electric toothbrush. Present situation].
    van der Weijden GA; Berendsen CM; Fokker AM; van Geest JT; Kalsbeek H; König KG; van Loveren C
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 May; 101(5):174-6. PubMed ID: 11830969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of a powered toothbrush compared with a manual toothbrush for orthodontic patients with fixed appliances.
    Borutta A; Pala E; Fischer T
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(4):131-7. PubMed ID: 12116723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A thirty-day evaluation of the Rowenta Dentiphant powered toothbrush in children for safety and efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):96-100. PubMed ID: 9238885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dentin abrasivity potential of a new electric toothbrush.
    Schemehorn BR; Zwart AC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jul; 9 Spec No():S19-20. PubMed ID: 9002783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of plaque removal effectiveness of an electric versus a manual toothbrush in children.
    Jongenelis AP; Wiedemann W
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(3):176-82, 165. PubMed ID: 9262798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The safety and efficacy of a children's power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in 6-11 year-olds.
    García-Godoy F; Marcushamer M; Cugini M; Warren PR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 11699736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two compact manual toothbrushes.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):111-3. PubMed ID: 8031478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A crossover clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of a new oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a high frequency electric toothbrush.
    Isaacs RL; Beiswanger BB; Rosenfield ST; Crawford JL; Mau MS; Eckert GJ; Warren PR
    Am J Dent; 1998 Feb; 11(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 9823079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.