These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5281426)

  • 1. [Calocryl c. p. g. as a material for taking impressions for cast inlays].
    Dachev B
    Stomatologiia (Sofiia); 1971; 53(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 5281426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of free space allowance for Dietrich impression material in multiple impressions].
    Lombardo JG; Gabrielli F; Abbade Dde O
    Rev Fac Farm Odontol Araraquara; 1969; 3(2):149-83. PubMed ID: 4915338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Impressions with silicones for the construction of metallic inlays].
    Zabotinsky AA
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1966; 14(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 5219220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproduction of details using dental stones and investment material in impressions of elastomers and waxes.
    Nilner K; Owall B
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):249-55. PubMed ID: 6963007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Inlays by the indirect method. Use of Mercap impression materials].
    Gutierrez JH; Valenzuela J; Garat J
    Rev Odontol Concepcion; 1967; 12(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 5247812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel approach to evaluating the reproducibility of a replication technique for the manufacture of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies.
    Chadwick RG; Mitchell HL; Ward S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 15089938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modified technic for use of hydrocolloids in taking impressions for inlays.
    INSKIPP EF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1949 Jan; 38(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 18104501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impression procedures for restorative dentistry.
    Brown MH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1967 Mar; ():147-61. PubMed ID: 5334351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal fit of cast gold MO inlays from disinfected elastomeric impressions.
    Merchant VA; Herrera SP; Dwan JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Sep; 58(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 3476736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinically oriented tests comparing accuracy of elastic impression materials.
    Bassett RW; Vander Heide JD; Smith DD
    J South Calif Dent Assoc; 1969 Feb; 37(2):47-57. PubMed ID: 5304732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Al-Jabrah O; Al-Shumailan Y; Al-Rashdan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 17580464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A new impression material for the casting of individual gold restorations].
    Landt H
    Odontol Foren Tidskr; 1966 Dec; 30(4):295-318. PubMed ID: 5335043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The new silicon-rubber impression material "Xirux" in enlargement of prostheses and in indirect inlay-technic].
    Schneider W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1965 Nov; 20(11):1226-7. PubMed ID: 5319780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reversible-irreversible hydrocolloid impressions for composite onlays.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2005 Dec; 24(12):56, 58-61; quiz 61. PubMed ID: 16396160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.