These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5281945)

  • 41. Peer review: reaction and action.
    Fechtner JL; Mallin RJ
    J Acad Gen Dent; 1971 Sep; 19(5):20-1. PubMed ID: 5287877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Is peer review for you?
    Swanson RD
    J Seattle King Cty Dent Soc; 1971; 10(3):4. PubMed ID: 5287620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Peer review made easy.
    Bronson HL
    J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1973 Dec; 1(6):46-8. PubMed ID: 4520725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Learning to live with peer review. 1.
    Durban ER
    Dent Econ; 1973 Apr; 63(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 4514645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Peer review and you.
    Malone LB
    J Ga Dent Assoc; 1972; 46(1):32. PubMed ID: 4506037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Peer review.
    Kane DL
    Fla Dent J; 1972; 43(3):28. PubMed ID: 4505317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The third party and peer review.
    Whiteman JR
    J Mo Dent Assoc; 1972 May; 52(5):18-20. PubMed ID: 4502913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Peer Review and the Medicaid program.
    Grenadier I
    Bull Bronx Cty Dent Soc; 1969 Mar; 24(3):2 passim. PubMed ID: 5250563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Peer review: a dental examiner's nightmare.
    Dent Stud; 1985 Mar; 63(6):49-50. PubMed ID: 3855813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Peer review and the New York State Dental Journal.
    Feinberg E
    N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(6):30-2. PubMed ID: 9333728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Peer review in review (or, how to avoid tangling with the Board of Dental Examiners).
    Zimmerman BJ
    J Colo Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 73(3):18-9. PubMed ID: 9470589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quality of dental care--the role of third-party payers: a literature review.
    Praiss IL; Tannenbaum KA; Gelder-Kogan CA
    Med Care Rev; 1978 Dec; 35(11):1211-33. PubMed ID: 10297310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Editorial. "The need for Peer Review".
    Taft L
    Bull Tenth Dist Dent Soc (Rockville Centre); 1970 Feb; 22(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 5267269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prudential OK's IRP concept.
    Tex Dent J; 1975 Dec; 93(12):19. PubMed ID: 1065035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dental prepayment and review: threat and opportunity.
    Drummey CE
    J Mass Dent Soc; 1971; 20(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 5287773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Who's standards, anyway?
    Maihofer MG
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2004 May; 86(5):18. PubMed ID: 15171140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quality controls.
    Fisher MA
    N Y State Dent J; 1971 Jan; 37(1):21. PubMed ID: 5274187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dear Editor:
    Flavin TJ
    J Dist Columbia Dent Soc; 1976; ():43-5. PubMed ID: 1070492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. March came in like a lion.
    Conley JF
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 May; 30(5):338-9. PubMed ID: 12041800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Need for dues increase and implementation of peer review.
    Nienaber WB
    Northwest Dent; 1971; 50(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 5281343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.