These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 528220)

  • 1. The use of weighting factors for computing doses when the body is non-uniformly irradiated.
    Jones A
    Health Phys; 1979 Nov; 37(5):709. PubMed ID: 528220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluence- and exposure-to-dose conversion for human whole-body gamma irradiation.
    O'Brien K
    Health Phys; 1978 Sep; 35(3):494-5. PubMed ID: 748249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential absorbed dose distributions in lineal energy for neutrons and gamma rays at the mono-energetic neutron calibration facility.
    Takada M; Baba M; Yamaguchi H; Fujitaka K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 15914511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relevance of dose for low-energy beta emitters.
    Goodhead DT
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 19690362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing an alpha radiation weighting factor for doses to non-human biota.
    Chambers DB; Osborne RV; Garva AL
    J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16377039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
    Roy CR
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose to red bone marrow of infants, children and adults from radiation of natural origin.
    Kendall GM; Fell TP; Harrison JD
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2):123-38. PubMed ID: 19454799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are all photon radiations similar in large absorbers?--a comparison of electron spectra.
    Kellerer AM; Roos H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15695239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weighting factors for radiation quality: how to unite the two current concepts.
    Kellerer AM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):781-7. PubMed ID: 15353747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An approach to setting radiation standards.
    Adler HI; Weinberg AM
    Health Phys; 1978 Jun; 34(6):719-20. PubMed ID: 730528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. French population exposure to radon, terrestrial gamma and cosmic rays.
    Billon S; Morin A; Caër S; Baysson H; Gambard JP; Backe JC; Rannou A; Tirmarche M; Laurier D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 15713740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The grand unification theory.
    McDonald JC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(2):193-4. PubMed ID: 15591426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NRC absorbed dose reconstruction for family member of 131I therapy patient: case study and commentary.
    Marcus CS; Siegel JA
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):13N-6N, 37N. PubMed ID: 15073236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.
    Martens L
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 17495651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of ICRP publication 92 on the conversion coefficients in use for cosmic ray dosimetry.
    Pelliccioni M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 15273348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emergent dose estimation of non-occupational persons accidentally exposed to 192 Ir gamma rays.
    Hashizume T; Kato Y; Nakajima T; Yamaguchi H; Fujimoto K
    Health Phys; 1972 Dec; 23(6):855-7. PubMed ID: 4641340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lung cancer risk in mice: analysis of fractionation effects and neutron RBE with a biologically motivated model.
    Heidenreich WF; Carnes BA; Paretzke HG
    Radiat Res; 2006 Nov; 166(5):794-801. PubMed ID: 17067205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tissue-equivalent TL sheet dosimetry system for X- and gamma-ray dose mapping.
    Nariyama N; Konnai A; Ohnishi S; Odano N; Yamaji A; Ozasa N; Ishikawa Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):136-9. PubMed ID: 16614090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.