These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 528293)

  • 21. Brain stem evoked response audiometry in neonates.
    Mandal AK; Mehra YN; Narang A; Raghunathan M; Walia BN
    Indian Pediatr; 1989 Jun; 26(6):566-70. PubMed ID: 2583808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and tone-burst auditory brainstem responses in normal babies.
    Rance G; Tomlin D; Rickards FW
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):751-62. PubMed ID: 17086084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials using a tone pip auditory stimulus.
    Papathanasiou ES; Zamba-Papanicolaou E; Pantziaris M; Kleopas K; Kyriakides T; Papacostas S; Pattichis C; Iliopoulos I; Piperidou C
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 15125057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory brainstem responses to clicks in neonates.
    Durieux-Smith A; Edwards CG; Picton TW; McMurray B
    J Otolaryngol Suppl; 1985 Feb; 14():12-8. PubMed ID: 3864988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Frequency specificity and on-effect in brainstem electric response audiometry.
    Debruyne F
    J Otolaryngol; 1982 Aug; 11(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 7131639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical considerations in the interpretation of auditory brainstem response audiometry.
    Jacobson JT; Novotny GM; Elliott S
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Dec; 9(6):493-504. PubMed ID: 7206036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [ABR short latency negative responses in neonates].
    Zagólski O
    Przegl Lek; 2005; 62(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 16053214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC; Houghton JM; Keith WJ; Greville KA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Binaural interaction in human auditory brainstem response compared for tone-pips and rectangular clicks under conditions of auditory and visual attention.
    Ikeda K
    Hear Res; 2015 Jul; 325():27-34. PubMed ID: 25776741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to tone-pips: results in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Hayes D; Jerger J
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 7178813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A slow brain stem response for low-frequency audiometry.
    Davis H; Hirsh SK
    Audiology; 1979; 18(6):445-61. PubMed ID: 526190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects.
    Gorga MP; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KA; Jesteadt W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 3352259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency specificity of the auditory brain stem response.
    McDonald JM; Shimizu H
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1981 Feb; 2(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7246917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On-effect in brainstem electric response audiometry. Consequences for the use of tone-bursts.
    Debruyne F; Forrez G
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1982; 44(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7070793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rise time of pure-tone stimuli in brain stem response audiometry.
    Suzuki T; Horiuchi K
    Audiology; 1981; 20(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 7224976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Slow brain stem responses (SN10) to tone pips in normally hearing newborns and adults.
    Hawes MD; Greenberg HJ
    Audiology; 1981; 20(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 7224977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in neonatology: the method and results in a group of normal newborns].
    Pasanisi E; Bacciu S; Fava G; Dallatomasina M; Bacciu A; Negri M; Piazza F; Montali S
    Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 1996; 67(5-6):191-5. PubMed ID: 10021703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An ignoring task improves validity of cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Ikeda K; Hayashi A; Matsuda O; Sekiguchi T
    Neuroreport; 2010 Jul; 21(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 20505550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Brain stem response audiometry at speech frequencies.
    Kodera K; Yamane H; Yamada O; Suzuki JI
    Audiology; 1977; 16(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 921605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Threshold sensitivity and frequency specificity in auditory brainstem response audiometry.
    Davis H; Hirsh SK; Turpin LL; Peacock ME
    Audiology; 1985; 24(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 3977784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.