These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Lingual orthodontics in the new era treatment according to criteria for occlusion and aesthetics. Fukawa R Int Orthod; 2009 Dec; 7(4):370-402. PubMed ID: 20303922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. To extract or not to extract: a diagnostic decision, not a marketing decision. Burrow SJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):341-2. PubMed ID: 18331930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment of a patient with a crowded Class I malocclusion and a congenitally missing mandibular incisor. Curiel P; Santoro M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 12490879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The harmonious profile in facial esthetics. The normal occlusion and the after-orthodontic treatment]. Nomura M Shikwa Gakuho; 1988 Nov; 88(11):1557-602. PubMed ID: 3255166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Avoiding extraction of bicuspid's, is it at all possible? Champagne M Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 24812733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A concern about facial esthetics. Hang WM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):27A-28A. PubMed ID: 2220687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Application of Charles H. Tweed's method of cephalometric study]. Hedin C; Kinazi MG Rev Fr Odontostomatol; 1969 May; 16(5):591-604. PubMed ID: 5257246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Invisible treatment of a Class III female adult patient with severe crowding and cross-bite. Fukui T; Tsuruta M J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 29(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 12444266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Changes of profile prominence in borderline cases with extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment]. Xu TM; Liu Y; Zhang HP; Lin JX Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Oct; 22(5):384-6. PubMed ID: 15562647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols. Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [A retrospective study of morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusion]. Li Q; Zheng Z; Bai D; Pang G Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 17(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 12539381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Extractions in dento-facial orthodontics]. Flaguel F Inf Dent; 1976 Jun; 58(24):29-46. PubMed ID: 1077340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A cephalometric comparison of cases treated with edgewise and Begg techniques. Barton JJ Angle Orthod; 1973 Jan; 43(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 4566913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Orthodontic treatment planning: do orthodontists treat to cephalometric norms? Al-Balkhi KM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Nov; 4(4):12-27. PubMed ID: 14625592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]