These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Does the Data Bank inhibit peer review? Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1990 Dec; 71(10):58, 62. PubMed ID: 10108010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review: current law and policy problems. Hyman DA Healthspan; 1991; 8(7):3-10. PubMed ID: 10114029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the future of peer review. Trostorff DL Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):23-31. PubMed ID: 10106574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The National Practitioner Data Bank: a step toward more effective peer review. Hackney VH J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jul; 24(7):201-9, 219. PubMed ID: 10111631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The lowest common denominator. Headlee R Wis Med J; 1975 Apr; 74(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 1146351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review of the inexpert witness, or ... do you trust chickens to guard the coop? Victoroff MS Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 11(9):14-6. PubMed ID: 12369343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of physician performance. N Engl J Med; 1980 Nov; 303(20):1182-3. PubMed ID: 7421942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. National Practitioner Data Bank identifying 'gypsy' physicians. Sandrick K Trustee; 1993 Mar; 46(3):11, 23. PubMed ID: 10124500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How do expert witnesses get away with lying? Crane M Med Econ; 1999 Jan; 76(1):152, 154, 163-4. PubMed ID: 10351077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Revalidation of physicians in Canada: are we passing the test? Levinson W CMAJ; 2008 Nov; 179(10):979-80. PubMed ID: 18981429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases. Leiker M WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Innovative peer review model for rural physicians: system design and implementation. Williams JR; Mechler K; Akins RB J Rural Health; 2008; 24(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 18643810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From collegial to codified. The evolution of modern peer review. Watts C Tex Med; 1995 Sep; 91(9):22-4. PubMed ID: 7570381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician, heal thyself: because the cure, the Health Care Quality Improvement Act, may be worse than the disease. Blaner KL Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1990 Jan; (131):7-46. PubMed ID: 10103479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of Patrick v. Burget on peer review. Gainer PS; Miles JJ Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):13-21. PubMed ID: 10290181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]