These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 528681)

  • 1. Comparison of direct and standard antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing for bacteria isolated from blood.
    Mirrett S; Reller LB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Oct; 10(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 528681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standardization of direct susceptibility test for blood cultures.
    Fay D; Oldfather JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Mar; 9(3):347-50. PubMed ID: 110825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates from blood cultures by direct inoculation and early reading of disk diffusion tests.
    Coyle MB; McGonagle LA; Plorde JJ; Clausen CR; Schoenknecht FD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 6490830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures by using Sensititre broth microdilution plates.
    Chapin KC; Musgnug MC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Oct; 41(10):4751-4. PubMed ID: 14532215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of direct and standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures.
    Johnson JE; Washington JA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Aug; 10(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 984763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance and clinical significance of direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing on urine from hospitalized patients.
    Breteler KB; Rentenaar RJ; Verkaart G; Sturm PD
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2011 Oct; 43(10):771-6. PubMed ID: 21696255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of direct disk diffusion and standard microtitre broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.
    Edelmann A; Pietzcker T; Wellinghausen N
    J Med Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 56(Pt 2):202-207. PubMed ID: 17244801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of direct and standard microtiter broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.
    Kiehn TE; Capitolo C; Armstrong D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jul; 16(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 7107862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of direct and standardized testing of infected urine for antimicrobial susceptibilities by disk diffusion.
    Oakes AR; Badger R; Grove DI
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Jan; 32(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 8126202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of agar dilution, broth microdilution, E-test, disk diffusion, and automated Vitek methods for testing susceptibilities of Enterococcus spp. to vancomycin.
    Kohner PC; Patel R; Uhl JR; Garin KM; Hopkins MK; Wegener LT; Cockerill FR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3258-63. PubMed ID: 9399530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 system using culture fluids from positive BacT/ALERT blood cultures.
    Chen JR; Lee SY; Yang BH; Lu JJ
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2008 Jun; 41(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 18629422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of contamination levels on antimicrobial susceptibilities tested by Autobac I.
    Shahidi A; Choey I
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Mar; 17(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 7425604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System for direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative rods from positive blood cultures in a three-phase trial.
    Funke G; Funke-Kissling P
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 42(4):1466-70. PubMed ID: 15070990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the effectiveness of different brands' disks in antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests.
    Lam CP; Tsai WC
    Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Aug; 22(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 2605979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation.
    Boland L; Streel C; De Wolf H; Rodriguez H; Verroken A
    BMC Infect Dis; 2019 Nov; 19(1):989. PubMed ID: 31752735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria.
    Baker CN; Stocker SA; Culver DH; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 2037671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance and potential clinical impact of Alfred60
    Van den Poel B; Meersseman P; Debaveye Y; Klak A; Verhaegen J; Desmet S
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2020 Jan; 39(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 31624985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of direct drug susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates comparing it with conventional disk diffusion testing.
    Imtiaz A; Ikram A; Zaman G; Satti L; Sana F
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Jan; 70(1):105-109. PubMed ID: 31954033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Automated direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of urine specimens].
    Magliani W; Goffi M; Conti S; Toni M
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1980 Dec; 16(4):428-36. PubMed ID: 7244113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of direct Etest for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from synovial fluid of horses using enrichment bottles.
    Dumoulin M; Martens A; Van den Abeele AM; Boyen F; Oosterlinck M; Wilderjans H; Gasthuys F; Haesebrouck F; Pille F
    Vet J; 2017 Feb; 220():55-62. PubMed ID: 28190496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.