These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5288885)

  • 1. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam.
    Duperon DF; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1971 Nov; 37(11):422-8. PubMed ID: 5288885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of three types of pins on the tensile strength of dental amalgam.
    Duperon DF; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1973 Feb; 39(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 4510580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Silver pins: their influence on the strength and adaptation of amalgam.
    Moffa JP; Going RE; Gettleman L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Nov; 28(5):491-9. PubMed ID: 4507571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The strength of class II amalgam restorations with and without pins.
    Mondelli J; Vieira DF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Aug; 28(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 4504302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of gold plating of stainless steel pins on the tensile strength of dental amalgam.
    Bapna MS; Lugassy AA
    J Dent Res; 1971; 50(4):846-9. PubMed ID: 5283242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The strength of dental amalgam as influenced by pins.
    Going RE; Moffa JP; Nostrant GW; Johnson BE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1968 Dec; 77(6):1331-4. PubMed ID: 5246636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rationale for pin-retained amalgam restorations.
    Collard EW; Caputo AA; Standlee JP
    Dent Clin North Am; 1970 Jan; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 5262043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Load fatigue of five restoration modalities in structurally compromised premolars.
    Fan P; Nicholls JI; Kois JC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10348588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam].
    Neumeyer S; Gernet W; Bötsch H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-inforcement of amalgam. 1: Effect of pin orientation, type, and number on the tensile strength of amalgam.
    el-Bahloul AN
    Egypt Dent J; 1977 Apr; 23(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 271565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Flow, dimensional changes and compressive strength of silver tin fillings with the addition of tin and amine fluorides of various concentrations].
    Bettac-Mollin V; Riethe P; Steffl M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Sep; 27(9):733-8. PubMed ID: 4507324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of copper plating of stainless steel pins on the shear bond strength of three brands of amalgam.
    Taher M; Elhamy AW; el-Kashif FO
    Egypt Dent J; 1983 Jan; 29(1):51-89. PubMed ID: 6378588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A photoelastic study of stress concentrations produced by retention pins in amalgam restorations.
    Dhuru VB; McLachlan K; Kasloff Z
    J Dent Res; 1979 Mar; 58(3):1060-4. PubMed ID: 370168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of pins on the compressive and transverse strength of dental amalgam and retention of pins in amalgam.
    Welk DA; Dilts WE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1969 Jan; 78(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 5248299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Channel depth and diameter: effects on transverse strength of amalgapin-retained restorations.
    Roddy WC; Blank LW; Rupp NW; Pelleu GB
    Oper Dent; 1987; 12(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 3469624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of impact loading upon Class II amalgam restoration.
    Johnson BE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1972; 39(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 4553905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The retention of amalgam and composite resin by a smooth, reverse-tapered pin.
    Brackett WW; Bailey JH
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(4):152-5. PubMed ID: 1287596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.