These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 528900)

  • 41. Role of familiar size in spatial judgments under natural viewing conditions.
    Predebon J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Feb; 48(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 450614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Properties of spatial representations: data from sighted and blind subjects.
    Haber RN; Haber LR; Levin CA; Hollyfield R
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8351180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Visual space perception at different levels of depth description.
    Šikl R; Šimeček M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):2098-107. PubMed ID: 25944450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The mental representation of knowledge acquired from maps.
    McNamara TP; Ratcliff R; McKoon G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Oct; 10(4):723-32. PubMed ID: 6239008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Map in Our Head Is Not Oriented North: Evidence from a Real-World Environment.
    Brunyé TT; Burte H; Houck LA; Taylor HA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0135803. PubMed ID: 26353119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Non-spatial similarity can bias spatial distances in a cognitive map.
    Xing X; Saunders JA
    Cognition; 2022 Dec; 229():105251. PubMed ID: 36152528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Earth is flat when personally significant experiences with the sphericity of the Earth are absent.
    Carbon CC
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):130-5. PubMed ID: 20356574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The role of verbal labels in the judgment of orientation and location.
    Maki RH; Braine LG
    Perception; 1985; 14(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 4069939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Constraining theories of embodied cognition.
    Markman AB; Brendl CM
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Jan; 16(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 15660844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Lateral eye movements and the recall of spatial information in a familiar, large-scale environment.
    Bruce PR; Herman JF; Stern J
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(4):505-8. PubMed ID: 7133389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Memory for familiar locations: The impact of age, education and cognitive efficiency on two neuropsychological allocentric tasks.
    Lopez A; Caffò AO; Bosco A
    Assessment; 2020 Oct; 27(7):1588-1603. PubMed ID: 30818973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A magnitude effect in judgments of subjective closeness.
    Kanten AB; Teigen KH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1712-22. PubMed ID: 26464033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.
    Keller M; Sutton JE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Mar; 76(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 33764100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Judgments of relative position and distance on representations of spatial relations.
    Sergent J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):762-80. PubMed ID: 1834789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Spatial cognition: systematic distortions in cognitive maps.
    Okabayashi H; Glynn SM
    J Gen Psychol; 1984 Oct; 111(2ND Half):271-9. PubMed ID: 6512518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Superior cognitive mapping through single landmark-related learning than through boundary-related learning.
    Zhou R; Mou W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1316-23. PubMed ID: 26844582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Comparison between sketch map and pointing methods for evaluating spatial cognitive ability of secondary school students with mental retardation].
    Murakoshi S; Yamaguchi Y; Matsumoto K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Oct; 75(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 15747555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Scaling techniques for modeling directional knowledge.
    Waller D; Haun DB
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 12834086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Knowledge of spatial relations: varying the precision with which locations must be specified.
    Wilton RN; Pidcock B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1982 Nov; 34(Pt 4):515-28. PubMed ID: 6891089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Higher height, higher ability: judgment confidence as a function of spatial height perception.
    Sun Y; Wang F; Li S
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22125. PubMed ID: 21818299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.