These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 528927)

  • 1. Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop Task.
    Simon JR; Sudalaimuthu P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Feb; 5(1):176-87. PubMed ID: 528927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction time to word meaning and ink color of laterally-presented stroop stimuli: effects of handedness and sex.
    Simon JR; Paullin C; Overmyer SP; Berbaum K
    Int J Neurosci; 1985 Oct; 28(1-2):21-33. PubMed ID: 4066188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'.
    Simon JR; Berbaum K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Mar; 73(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 2343770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.
    Wühr P; Biebl R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 19304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.
    Marini M; Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 21592943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Stroop congruency effect is more observable under a speed strategy than an accuracy strategy.
    Chen JY; Johnson MK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1945723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Display-control arrangement correspondence and logical recoding in the Hedge and Marsh reversal of the Simon effect.
    Proctor RW; F Pick D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Mar; 112(3):259-78. PubMed ID: 12595150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.
    Proctor RW; Lu CH
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 10087857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transitions between color categories mapped with a reverse Stroop task.
    Smithson HE; Khan SS; Sharpe LT; Stockman A
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16961980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coloring an action: intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect.
    Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2004 Apr; 68(2-3):74-90. PubMed ID: 14634808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 22390293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):95-136. PubMed ID: 11216323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.
    Regev S; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 25822920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task.
    Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 29(Pt 1):138-47. PubMed ID: 21288259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture.
    Ansorge U; Priess HW; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1687-702. PubMed ID: 24027028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.