These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 528951)
41. Single judgments of numerosity. Krueger LE Percept Psychophys; 1982 Feb; 31(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 7079098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Tests of the psychological meaning of the power law. Duda PD J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 May; 104(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 1194869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Perceiving the size of trees: biological form and the horizon ratio. Bingham GP Percept Psychophys; 1993 Oct; 54(4):485-95. PubMed ID: 8255711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Influence of six types of visual structure on complexity judgments in children and adults. Chipman SF; Mendelson MJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):365-78. PubMed ID: 528946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Direct estimation considered within a comparative judgment framework. Smith J; Kaufman H; Baldasare J Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(3):343-58. PubMed ID: 6496808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effects of distance between objects and distance from the vertical axis on shape identity judgments. Friedman A; Pilon DJ Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):552-64. PubMed ID: 7968551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Understanding the structural determinants of object confusion in memory: an assessment of psychophysical approaches to estimating visual similarity. Desmarais G; Dixon MJ Percept Psychophys; 2005 Aug; 67(6):980-96. PubMed ID: 16396007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The contributions of static visual cues, nonvisual cues, and optic flow in distance estimation. Sun HJ; Campos JL; Young M; Chan GS; Ellard CG Perception; 2004; 33(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 15035328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A caution regarding use of the hint procedure to determine whether partial stimulus information activates responses. Proctor RW; Reeve TG Percept Psychophys; 1986 Aug; 40(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 3763358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The processing of spatial frequency and orientation information. Chua FK Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 2300428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Distance and organization in multifunction displays. Seidler KS; Wickens CD Hum Factors; 1992 Oct; 34(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 1459566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Visual perception of surface wrinkles. Fan J; Liu F Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):925-34. PubMed ID: 16491698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Exposure effects on the psychophysical scaling methods of magnitude estimation and cross-modal matching for vibrotactile stimulation of the tongue and hand. Fucci D; Petrosino L; Harris D; Randolph-Tyler E Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 3399322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory. McNamara TP; Diwadkar VA Cogn Psychol; 1997 Nov; 34(2):160-90. PubMed ID: 9398395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]