These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 528952)

  • 1. Time errors and differential sensation weighting.
    Hellström A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):460-77. PubMed ID: 528952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
    Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal weights in the level discrimination of time-varying sounds.
    Pedersen B; Ellermeier W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):963-72. PubMed ID: 18247899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison is not just subtraction: effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference.
    Hellström A
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1161-77. PubMed ID: 14674641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Variations in the loudness of a brief sound compared to another brief sound as a function of the duration of both sounds].
    Szymanski L; Chocholle R
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1976 Oct; 170(3):558-62. PubMed ID: 135614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loudness and auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing subjects.
    Zenker Castro F; Barajas de Prat JJ; Larumbe Zabala E
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 18465411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The temporal weighting of loudness: effects of the level profile.
    Oberfeld D; Plank T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):189-208. PubMed ID: 21258919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of time-order, interstimulus interval, and feedback in duration discrimination of noise bursts in the 50- and 1000-ms ranges.
    Hellström A; Rammsayer TH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 May; 116(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15111227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Relationship between evaluation of the duration and loudness of short sounds].
    Szymanski L; Chocholle R
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1976 Oct; 170(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 135616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Temporal stimulus structure, gestalt perception and electrodermal reaction pattern].
    Baltissen R
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1993; 40(1):18-43. PubMed ID: 8328165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shortening of subjective tone intervals followed by repetitive tone stimuli.
    Ono F; Kitazawa S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 20139462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects.
    Ménard M; Gallégo S; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L; Thai-Van H
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):105-13. PubMed ID: 18093768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of yes-no and latency measures of auditory intensity discrimination.
    Green M; Terman M; Terman JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 512569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a rhythmic context have an effect on perceptual weights in auditory intensity processing?
    Oberfeld D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Mar; 62(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 18473626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory and cognitive factors in judgments of loudness.
    Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):426-43. PubMed ID: 528950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory fusion in children.
    Davis SM; McCroskey RL
    Child Dev; 1980 Mar; 51(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 7363751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?
    Schneider B; Parker S
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Nov; 48(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 2247323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnitude judgments of loudness change for discrete, dynamic, and hybrid stimuli.
    Pastore RE; Flint J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):886-907. PubMed ID: 21264709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modality-specific effects on discrimination of short empty time intervals.
    Hocherman S; Ben-Dov G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 1):807-14. PubMed ID: 482034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.