These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Variation in spectral-shape discrimination weighting functions at different stimulus levels and signal strengths. Lentz JJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1702. PubMed ID: 17927430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of stimulus frequency, level, and duration on auditory temporal ordering. Parker RM; Kasten RN; McCroskey RL; Hoyer EA J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 7185814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training. Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intramodal and crossmodal pairing and anchoring in comparisons of successive stimuli. Hellström Å; Cederström C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1197-211. PubMed ID: 24604542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Temporal loudness weights for sounds with increasing and decreasing intensity profiles. Ponsot E; Susini P; Saint Pierre G; Meunier S J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL321-6. PubMed ID: 24116537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration. Rammsayer TH Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1591-600. PubMed ID: 20675803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of brief-tone stimulus duration on the brain stem auditory steady-state response. Mo L; Stapells DR Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 18091096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of duration, frequency, and loudness upon the reproduction of temporal intervals. Deal LV; Oyer HJ J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1232079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Reaction time and temporal serial judgment: corroboration or dissociation?]. Neumann O; Koch R; Niepel M; Tappe T Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(4):621-45. PubMed ID: 1295274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of stimulus context on magnitude estimations and category ratings of perceived loudness--the spacing of intensity intervals. Davis ET; Allard T Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):227-42. PubMed ID: 2038517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stimulus sequence and the exponent of the power function for loudness. Baird JC; Berglund B; Berglund U; Lindberg S Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 1945709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Velocity perception for sounds moving in frequency space. Henry MJ; McAuley JD Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):172-88. PubMed ID: 21258918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Time-order errors and standard-position effects in duration discrimination: An experimental study and an analysis by the sensation-weighting model. Hellström Å; Rammsayer TH Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2409-23. PubMed ID: 26082151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of interstimulus interval on subjective categorical loudness judgements. Ruscetta MN; Palmer CV J Am Acad Audiol; 2000; 11(10):570-4. PubMed ID: 11198074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Decomposing the Garner interference paradigm: evidence for dissociations between macrolevel and microlevel performance. Dyson BJ; Quinlan PT Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1676-91. PubMed ID: 20675810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]