These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5290164)

  • 1. Variation for metrical characters in drosophila populations. 3. The nature of selection.
    Linney R; Barnes BW; Kearsey MJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 1971 Oct; 27(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 5290164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations. II. Natural selection.
    Kearsey MU; Barnes BW
    Heredity (Edinb); 1970 Feb; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 5004595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations. I. Genetic analysis.
    Barnes BW; Kearsey MJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 1970 Feb; 25(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 5004597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal control of heterosis for yield in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Barnes BW
    Heredity (Edinb); 1968 Nov; 23(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 5253586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural selection for a metrical trait in a population of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Killick RJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 1970 Feb; 25(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 5004596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura with different initial frequencies of chromosomal variants.
    Watanabe T; Anderson WW; Dobzhansky T; Pavlovsky O
    Genet Res; 1970 Feb; 15(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 5415223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VI. Further studies on the optimum heterozygosity hypothesis.
    Mukai T
    Genetics; 1969 Feb; 61(2):479-95. PubMed ID: 5807811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. X. Developmental time and viability.
    Mukai T; Yamazaki T
    Genetics; 1971 Nov; 69(3):385-98. PubMed ID: 5002805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurochemical genetics.
    Csányi V
    Int Rev Neurobiol; 1984; 25():361-89. PubMed ID: 6469472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic heterogeneity among the founders of laboratory populations of Drosophila. I. Scutellar chaetae.
    Parsons PA; Hosgood SM
    Genetica; 1968; 38(3):328-39. PubMed ID: 5658757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic differences between populations of Drosophila melanogaster for a quantitative trait. I. Laboratory populations.
    López-Fanjul C; Hill WG
    Genet Res; 1973 Aug; 22(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 4203701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic differences between populations of Drosophila melanogaster for a quantitative trait. II. Wild and laboratory populations.
    López-Fanjul C; Hill WG
    Genet Res; 1973 Aug; 22(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 4203702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. 3. Analyses of the lines.
    Frankham R; Jones LP; Barker JS
    Genet Res; 1968 Dec; 12(3):267-83. PubMed ID: 5713600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population genetics.
    Lewontin RC
    Annu Rev Genet; 1973; 7():1-17. PubMed ID: 4593304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic response to environmental heterogeneity.
    McDonald JF; Ayala FJ
    Nature; 1974 Aug; 250(467):572-4. PubMed ID: 4845657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The extent of variation in male song, wing and genital characters among allopatric Drosophila montana populations.
    Routtu J; Mazzi D; Van der Linde K; Mirol P; Butlin RK; Hoikkala A
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1591-601. PubMed ID: 17584251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population genetics in the American Tropics. IX. Rhythmic genetic changes that prove the adaptive nature of the detrimental load in Drosophila melanogaster from Caracolisito, Colombia.
    Hoenigsberg HF; Castro LE; Granobles LA; Saez A
    Basic Life Sci; 1973; 2():281-99. PubMed ID: 4209050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of the mating system on the maintenance of genetic variability in polygenic characters.
    Lande R
    Genetics; 1977 Jun; 86(2 Pt. 1):485-98. PubMed ID: 407132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection effects in a model of two intermigrating colonies of finite size.
    Avery PJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 1978 Feb; 13(1):24-39. PubMed ID: 644518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further evidence for coadaptation in crosses between geographic populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Anderson WW
    Genet Res; 1968 Dec; 12(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 5713603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.