110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5292192)
1. [Cephalometric evaluation of the results obtained by the use of different technics in the treatment of class II, div. 1].
Strate FG; Dotto AL
Ortodoncia; 1971 Nov; 35(70):154-66. PubMed ID: 5292192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Class II-2 treatment with the ribbon arch].
Strate FG; Rotmistrovsky CA
Ortodoncia; 1972 May; 36(71):61-6. PubMed ID: 4504167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cephalometric survey of reaction to orthodontic treatment in anterior cross-bite cases. 3. Cases treated with the chin cap].
Susami R; Akiyama K; Oonishi K; Yamano C; Deguchi T
Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1966; 25(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 5225274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cephalometric study of 20 cases treated exclusively by means of the Soulet-Besombes activators].
Soulet R; Langlade M; Picaud M
Orthod Fr; 1969; 40():355-73. PubMed ID: 5270759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator].
Demirović D; Filipović M
Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2638168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cephalometric appraisal of the results of orthodontic treatment on fifty five unsuccessfully corrected difficult Class II malocclusions.
Gramling JF
J Charles H. Tweed Int Found; 1987 Apr; 15():112-24. PubMed ID: 3509551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A cephalometric appraisal of the results of orthodontic treatment on one hundred fifty successfully corrected difficult Class II malocclusions.
Gramling JF
J Charles H. Tweed Int Found; 1987 Apr; 15():102-11. PubMed ID: 3509550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Tweed treatment and the biretrusive profile].
Manetti V; Manetti A
Attual Dent; 1988 Oct; 4(34):10-1, 13-5, 17-21. PubMed ID: 3269748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Design of bionators and bio-finishers using cephalometric analysis and bio-finishers. Part 1.
Rondeau BH
J Am Acad Gnathol Orthop; 1989 Mar; 6(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 2599920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A cephalometric comparison of cases treated with edgewise and Begg techniques.
Barton JJ
Angle Orthod; 1973 Jan; 43(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 4566913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric observation in Class II, Division I malocclusions treated with the activator.
Freunthaller P
Angle Orthod; 1967 Jan; 37(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 5225689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Corrective treatment of Angle class, II, div. 1 in the light of modern knowledge of orofacial bio-orthodontics].
Giannì E
Mondo Odontostomatol; 1972; 14(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 4631887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Correlation between various decisive parameters in the treatment of class 3 malocclusions with the functional orthodontic appliance of Fränkel and the active plate of A.M. Schwarz].
Mühlberg G; Zill G
Dtsch Stomatol; 1969 Sep; 19(9):681-8. PubMed ID: 5260234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cephalometric study of the skeletal modifications in children with class 2, div. 1, treated by means of various therapeutic methods].
Bassani S
Orthod Fr; 1965; 36():199-219. PubMed ID: 5249373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Treatment plan: the indispensible help of the patient].
Manetti V; Manetti A
Attual Dent; 1988 Jun; 4(23):20-3, 26-31. PubMed ID: 3250610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Treatment of a basal and dental Class II malocclusion in mixed dentition, with functional appliances and extraoral traction].
Viora E; Mossino ML; Ramirez Velarde JC; Guglielmino D
Minerva Ortognatod; 1989; 7(3-4):117-32. PubMed ID: 2640572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Class 3 malocclusion cases treated by the Begg technique].
Motohashi K; Hioki M; Ono T; Sato M; Yogosawa F
Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1968 Dec; 27(2):414-32. PubMed ID: 5252129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [A study of the anchorage preparation, in orthodontic treatment, by means of metallic implants (author's transl)].
Martins DR; Interlandi S; de Almeida RR
Ortodontia; 1978; 11(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 291878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cephalometric study of the vertical dimension of cases of class II, division I malocclusion, demonstrating a strong incisor supraclusion and treated by the Bimler therapeutic method].
Stromboni Y; Mosse A
Orthod Fr; 1973; 44(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 4534445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cephalometric study of the results of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion].
Antonini A; Vichi M; Defraia E
Stomatol Mediterr; 1989; 9(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 2639521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
