These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5293017)

  • 1. [Cephalometric study of the behavior of soft tissues in 40 cases of malocclusion class II division I treated by Ricketts' method].
    Stromboni Y; Langlade M; Picaud M
    Orthod Fr; 1971; 42():259-84. PubMed ID: 5293017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A comparative roentgeno-cephalometric analysis of sagittal jaw relations in patients with Angle Class I, II and III malocclusion].
    Muretić Z; Rak D
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1985; 19(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 3868299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cephalometric study of the vertical dimension of cases of class II, division I malocclusion, demonstrating a strong incisor supraclusion and treated by the Bimler therapeutic method].
    Stromboni Y; Mosse A
    Orthod Fr; 1973; 44(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 4534445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalometric variation in patients with and without intraoral neuromuscular repositioning appliance.
    Learreta JA; Moses AJ
    J Gen Orthod; 1999; 10(2):14-21. PubMed ID: 10535034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cluster analysis application to Class I malocclusion.
    Espona IG; Gomez JT; Carmona JB
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Jun; 17(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 7621924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Profile types in relation to facial angle in different skeletal jaw relationships].
    Blazeyĭ Z; Tanic T; Radojicic J
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2009; 88(6):66-72. PubMed ID: 20081785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molar bite force in relation to occlusion, craniofacial dimensions, and head posture in pre-orthodontic children.
    Sonnesen L; Bakke M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 15743864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of skeletal and dental pattern of Class II division 1 malocclusion with relevance to clinical practice.
    Sidlauskas A; Svalkauskiene V; Sidlauskas M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 16687908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Brezniak N; Arad A; Heller M; Dinbar A; Dinte A; Wasserstein A
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 12071609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children.
    Pancherz H; Zieber K; Hoyer B
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 9107375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cephalometric comparison between class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion.
    Godiawala RN; Joshi MR
    Angle Orthod; 1974 Jul; 44(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 4527603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Craniofacial morphology of Japanese girls with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Ishii N; Deguchi T; Hunt NP
    J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 11504898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two angular and two linear measurements used to establish sagittal apical base relationship.
    Järvinen S
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 6941890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the closest speaking space in different dental and skeletal occlusions.
    Sakar O; Bural C; Sülün T; Öztaş E; Marşan G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 23566602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents.
    Guyer EC; Ellis EE; McNamara JA; Behrents RG
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jan; 56(1):7-30. PubMed ID: 3485393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dummy- and finger-sucking habits with special attention to their significance for facial growth and occlusion. 5. Improvement of malocclusion after termination of the habit.
    Larsson E
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1972 Dec; 65(12):635-42. PubMed ID: 4517214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Investigation of the vertical variations in the anterior region of Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated with different techniques].
    Hamamci O
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 2489155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Anomalies of the basal-distal relationship. III].
    da Cruz JP
    Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1985; 26(1):109-71. PubMed ID: 4012181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glenoid fossa position in Class III malocclusion associated with mandibular protrusion.
    Innocenti C; Giuntini V; Defraia E; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 19361728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.