These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5293250)

  • 1. [Comparative study of complex class II cavities as to retention under axial load of traction].
    Sartini Filho R
    Bol Dent Oper; 1971; 3():54-78. PubMed ID: 5293250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration].
    Xu X; Sun Z; Tao L; Xiong H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of impact loading upon Class II amalgam restoration.
    Johnson BE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1972; 39(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 4553905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of grooves on resistance form of Class 2 amalgams with wide occlusal preparations.
    Summitt JB; Osborne JW; Burgess JO; Howell ML
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 8337180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tunnel restorations versus class II restorations for small proximal lesions: a comparison of tooth strengths.
    Papa J; Cain C; Messer HH; Wilson PR
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 8511270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class III cavity preparation in primary anterior teeth: in vitro retention comparison of conventional and modified forms.
    Piyapinyo S; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 9643182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of the configuration factor in Class I and II cavities and simulated cervical erosions.
    de la Macorra JC; Gomez-Fernandez S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Mar; 4(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9171011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration.
    Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15134941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations.
    Yaman SD; Yetmez M; Türköz E; Akkas N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations.
    Roberts HW; Hermesch CB; Charlton DG
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11203830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a reinforced slot design for CEREC system to restore extensively compromised premolars.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Chang WJ; Cheng MH
    J Dent; 2006 Mar; 34(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 16112335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of the compaction of pure gold into retention holes, convenience points and point angles in Class 3 cavity preparations.
    Smith GE; Hodson JT; Stibbs GD
    J Am Acad Gold Foil Oper; 1972 Apr; 15(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 4502539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compomers adaptation to Class I and V cavities in permanent teeth.
    el-Kalla IH; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(1):29-36, 8. PubMed ID: 10736655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities.
    Demirci M; Sancakli HS
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16555657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Black's principles confronted with the reality of a class II cavity].
    Vandermeulen G
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1978; 33(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 284522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Indications for the use of amalgam and the importance of cavity preparation].
    Riethe P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 6931805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A modified technique for direct Class II posterior composite restorations.
    Blatz MB; Atlas A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006; 18(10):624. PubMed ID: 17283691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Influence of form and localization of proximal retention on amalgam restoration resistance].
    de Lima Navarro MF; Franco EB; Mondelli J; Steagall L; Chinelatto LE
    Ars Curandi Odontol; 1980 Jan; 6(10):56-60. PubMed ID: 6933976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Excellence in class II direct composite restorations.
    Shuman I
    Dent Today; 2007 Apr; 26(4):102, 104-5. PubMed ID: 17486784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Della Bona A; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.