These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 530806)
1. Information used in judging impending collision. Schiff W; Detwiler ML Perception; 1979; 8(6):647-58. PubMed ID: 530806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of optic expansion rates when judging the relative time to contact of familiar objects. Hosking SG; Crassini B J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21628397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of changes in size, speed, and distance on the perception of curved 3-D trajectories. Zhang J; Braunstein ML; Andersen GJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 23007204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is judging time-to-contact based on 'tau'? Smeets JB; Brenner E; Trébuchet S; Mestre DR Perception; 1996; 25(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 8865299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Judging the time to collision with a simulated textured object: effect of mismatching rate of expansion of object size and of texture element size. Vincent A; Regan D Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 9038405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time-to-contact judgments of an approaching object that is partially concealed by an occluder. DeLucia PR J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 15053689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Judging the contact-times of multiple objects: Evidence for asymmetric interference. Baurès R; Oberfeld D; Hecht H Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 20423735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual processing of the impending collision of a looming object: time to collision revisited. Yan JJ; Lorv B; Li H; Sun HJ J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22003252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motion in depth: adequate and inadequate simulation. Gray R; Regan D Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):236-45. PubMed ID: 10089758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infants' timing strategies to optical collisions: a longitudinal study. Kayed NS; van der Meer AL Infant Behav Dev; 2007 Feb; 30(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17292779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy. Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential contribution of velocity and distance to time estimation during self-initiated time-to-collision judgment. Li Y; Mo L; Chen Q Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 73():35-47. PubMed ID: 25934633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speed, size, and edge-rate information for the detection of collision events. Andersen GJ; Cisneros J; Atchley P; Saidpour A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Feb; 25(1):256-69. PubMed ID: 10069034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Information used in detecting upcoming collision. Bootsma RJ; Craig CM Perception; 2003; 32(5):525-44. PubMed ID: 12854640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Allocentric time-to-contact and the devastating effect of perspective. Landwehr K; Hecht H; Both B Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():53-60. PubMed ID: 25255991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Illusory temporal order for stimuli at different depth positions. Ichikawa M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):578-93. PubMed ID: 19304648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects. Kaneko H; Uchikawa K Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]