These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 530809)

  • 1. Cerebral asymmetries in random-dot stereopsis: reversal of direction with changes in dot size.
    Pitblado CB
    Perception; 1979; 8(6):683-90. PubMed ID: 530809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lateral differences in the detection of stereoscopic depth.
    Grabowska A
    Neuropsychologia; 1983; 21(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 6877578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective.
    Yellott JI; Kaiwi JL
    Perception; 1979; 8(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 471677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects on depth perception and pattern recognition in random dot stereograms by changing the matrix dot density].
    Pressmar SB; Haase W
    Ophthalmologe; 2001 Oct; 98(10):955-9. PubMed ID: 11699317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual-field asymmetries in letter recognition: evidence for asymmetry in early visual registration.
    Pitblado C; Petrides M; Riccio G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 503735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Form and depth in global stereopsis.
    Chung CS; Berbaum K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 6232344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loss of stereopsis following lesions of cortical areas 17-18 in the cat.
    Ptito M; Lepore F; Guillemot JP
    Exp Brain Res; 1992; 89(3):521-30. PubMed ID: 1644118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaired stereoscopic detection thresholds after left or right temporal lobectomy.
    Ptito A; Zatorre RJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 3405400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatio-temporal discrimination of frequency in the right and left visual fields: a preliminary report.
    Rao SM; Rourke D; Whitman RD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):311-6. PubMed ID: 7290879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Depth inversion in random-dot stereograms.
    Frisby JP; Mayhew JE
    Perception; 1979; 8(4):397-9. PubMed ID: 503770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Field asymmetries for verbal and dot localization tasks in monolingual and bilingual subjects.
    Sewell DF; Panou L
    Brain Lang; 1983 Jan; 18(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 6839131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Task differences in the tachistoscopic Kanji recognition and their relations to hemisphere asymmetries (author's transl)].
    Hatta T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1981 Aug; 52(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 7328929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vernier acuity and stereopsis with discontinuously moving stimuli.
    Morgan MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1981 Aug; 48(1-3):57-67. PubMed ID: 7304241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of dot size in random-dot stereograms on the results of stereoacuity measurements.
    Zhao L; Wu H
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):253. PubMed ID: 32580763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual variation in directional bias in visual perception.
    Annett M
    Perception; 1983; 12(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 6646956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Random dot stereograms and the limits of their detectability].
    Pittke EC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 192(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 3404945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateral differences in visual processing: relative vs exclusive hemispheric specialization.
    Bruyer R
    Hum Neurobiol; 1986; 5(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 3733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Target detection in one visual field in the presence or absence of stimuli in the contralateral field by right- and left-handed subjects.
    Yund EW; Efron R; Nichols DR
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 2297429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binocularly evoked potentials: slow, late components to random-dot stereograms and correlograms (dynamic Julesz patterns).
    Lehmann D; Skrandies W; Lindenmaier C
    Prog Brain Res; 1980; 54():286-90. PubMed ID: 7220927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: new data and a meta-analysis of previous studies.
    Van Kleeck MH
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(9):1165-78. PubMed ID: 2812299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.