These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 531473)

  • 1. Reliability in the determination of speech reception threshold (SRT).
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 531473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
    Plomp R; Mimpen AM
    Audiology; 1979; 18(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 760724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest variability in testing hearing of speech.
    Hughes EC; Arthur RH; Johnson RL
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 511653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thresholds and psychometric functions of the individual spondaic words.
    Young LL; Dudley B; Gunter MB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):586-93. PubMed ID: 7162160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN).
    Dawson PW; Hersbach AA; Swanson BA
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 23598772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry.
    Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of sophistication on three threshold tests for subjects with simulated hearing loss.
    Martin FN; Shipp DB
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 7060844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the TIP and DIP speech-hearing tests for children.
    Siegenthaler BM
    J Commun Disord; 1975 Dec; 8(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 803155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of speech reception threshold. A comparison between two methods.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 7178820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
    Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pediatric speech intelligibility test: performance-intensity characteristics.
    Jerger S; Jerger J
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(6):325-34. PubMed ID: 7152156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Noordhoek IM; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1685-96. PubMed ID: 10738821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.
    Plomp R; Mimpen AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Nov; 66(5):1333-42. PubMed ID: 500971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The internal and external consistency of a speech reception threshold test for isiZulu speakers with normal hearing sensitivity.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Wilson W
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 Jun; 65(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 30035610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region.
    Noordhoek IM; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1197-212. PubMed ID: 11303933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.
    Nilsson M; Soli SD; Sullivan JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1085-99. PubMed ID: 8132902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.