These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [Cesarean section by longitudinal uterine incision]. Uchiyama M; Camano L Rev Paul Med; 1987; 105(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 3432888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean section. Boyd ME Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3276370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transverse fundal uterine incision in a patient with placenta increta. Shukunami K; Hattori K; Nishijima K; Kotsuji F J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Dec; 16(6):355-6. PubMed ID: 15621555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical observation of Stark cesarean section as secondary abdominal surgery]. Ma YY; Zhu XL; Dong Y; Wang YQ; Zheng ZM; Zhang RJ; Xu Y; Zhao JJ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(11):729-31. PubMed ID: 16324243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection of an incision site for cesarean section in the cow. Noorsdy JL Vet Med Small Anim Clin; 1979 Apr; 74(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 256377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Single-layer or double-layer suturing of the uterine incision in cesarean section? The late prognosis]. Iankov M Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1999; 38(4):11-2. PubMed ID: 10726342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routine cesarean sections? Ohel G; Younis JS; Lang N; Levit A J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 8972417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean. Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice of abdominal incision and risk of trauma to the urinary bladder and bowel in multiple cesarean sections. Makoha FW; Fathuddien MA; Felimban HM Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Mar; 125(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 16029923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparative evaluation of the Joel-Cohen cesarean section versus the transrectal incision]. Le Dû R; Bernardini M; Agostini A; Mazouni C; Shojai R; Blanc B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Sep; 36(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 17335999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference? Chauhan SP; Roach H; Naef RW; Magann EF; Morrison JC; Martin JN J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 9219122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of a newer technique for cesarean section. Lurie S; Feinstein M; Mamet Y Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2002 Aug; 266(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 12192477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterine incision and maternal morbidity after cesarean section for delivery of the very low birthweight fetus. Druzin ML; Hutson JM; San Roman G Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Aug; 169(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 2756460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [An advantage of isthmo-cervical longitudinal incision in cesarean section of low-birth weight infants]. Bellée H; Link M Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(24):1589-92. PubMed ID: 3223125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]