These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5317759)

  • 1. Range estimation of familiar targets presented against a black background. NASA TN D-2845.
    Beasley GP; Pennington JE
    Tech Note U S Natl Aeronaut Space Adm; 1965 Nov; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 5317759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Problems in depth perception: perceived size and distance of familiar objects. AM 66-22.
    Gogel WC; Mertens HW
    AM Rep; 1966 Apr; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 5954653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The effects of familiar-size cue on children's judgments of size and distance].
    Higashiyama A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Dec; 53(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 7169706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infants' sensitivity to familiar size as information for distance.
    Yonas A; Pettersen L; Granrud CE
    Child Dev; 1982 Oct; 53(5):1285-90. PubMed ID: 7140431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived size and perceived distance of targets viewed from between the legs: evidence for proprioceptive theory.
    Higashiyama A; Adachi K
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):3961-76. PubMed ID: 16979687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference.
    Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):515-26. PubMed ID: 12075885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Familial and assumed size as signal of distance and depth perception].
    Bredenkamp J
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1984; 136(2):89-105. PubMed ID: 6517682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Echolocation: discrimination of targets by the bat, Eptesicus fuscus.
    Simmons JA; Vernon JA
    J Exp Zool; 1971 Mar; 176(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 5548872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual size-constancy as a function of distance for temporarily and permanently monocular observers.
    Leibowitz HW; Dato RA
    Am J Psychol; 1966 Jun; 79(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 5915912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of false perspective cues on distance and size-judgments: an examination of the invariance hypothesis.
    Blessing WW; Landauer AA; Coltheart M
    Am J Psychol; 1967 Jun; 80(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 6055057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The size-distance invariance hypothesis: a reply to Cook.
    Britten R
    Am J Psychol; 1967 Dec; 80(4):640-2. PubMed ID: 6081404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of target elevation in prey selection by tiger beetles (Carabidae: Cicindela spp.).
    Layne JE; Chen PW; Gilbert C
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Nov; 209(Pt 21):4295-303. PubMed ID: 17050844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [On the problem of the relation of perceived size to perceived distance].
    Holzkamp K
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1966; 13(1):39-72. PubMed ID: 5916310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overestimation of the projected size of objects on the surface of mirrors and windows.
    Lawson R; Bertamini M; Liu D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1027-44. PubMed ID: 17924805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of linear perspective on relative size discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Imura T; Tomonaga M; Yagi A
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 17766056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimates of size and distance underwater.
    Luria SM; Kinney JA; Weissman S
    Am J Psychol; 1967 Jun; 80(2):282-6. PubMed ID: 6055062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emmert's laws. Size constancy vs. optical geometry.
    Weintraub DJ; Gardner GT
    Am J Psychol; 1970 Mar; 83(1):40-54. PubMed ID: 5449391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination is more closely associated with perceived similarity than with distance and color.
    King DL; Hauser SR
    J Gen Psychol; 2005 Jul; 132(3):293-311. PubMed ID: 16011077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of test distance on the CN lantern results.
    Hovis JK; Ramaswamy S
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):675-9. PubMed ID: 16962012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monocular and binocular size-matching as a function of distance at various age-levels.
    Leibowitz HW; Pollard SW; Dickson D
    Am J Psychol; 1967 Jun; 80(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 6055059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.