These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5320927)

  • 1. [Comparative study of the disk technic and of the tube dilution technic for determining the susceptibility of bacteria to antibiotics].
    Rodríguez MA
    Medicina (Mex); 1965 Jun; 45(965):247-53. PubMed ID: 5320927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Criteria for antibacterial susceptibility in vitro].
    Soriano F; Fernández-Roblas R
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1995 Mar; 13(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 7734498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Behavior of various Erwinia species against antibiotics].
    Iriarte MT; Fernández P
    Microbiol Esp; 1968; 21(3):175-92. PubMed ID: 4893898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of microtitration techniques to bacteriostatic and bactericidal antibiotic susceptibility testing.
    Harwick HJ; Weiss P; Fekety FR
    J Lab Clin Med; 1968 Sep; 72(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 4877134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Determining the antibiotic resistance profile of the causative agents of secondary (mixed) infections in pulmonary tuberculosis].
    Mitrokhin SD; Zubkov MM; Ivushkina LV
    Probl Tuberk Bolezn Legk; 2006; (9):54-62. PubMed ID: 17128804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative characteristics of the main variants of rapid methods of determining the relationship of bacteria to antibiotics].
    Blokhov VP
    Voen Med Zh; 1968 Dec; 12():58-60. PubMed ID: 5707251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Preparation of paper disks with antibiotics in a practical laboratory].
    Chernomordik AB
    Lab Delo; 1972; 3():186-8. PubMed ID: 4113051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative investigations on different methods for the determination of the sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics.
    Popovici M; Alexenco E; Raicev V
    Rom Med Rev; 1967; 21(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 5341241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of chemotherapeutic agents on continuous flow culture].
    Ozawa A; Konno S
    Rinsho Byori; 1971 Aug; 19():Suppl:446. PubMed ID: 4945458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The correlation between the MICs deduced from Showa disk method and the MICs determined by micro-dilution method].
    Moroizumi S; Kasitani F; Isikawa M; Iwata M; Ohno A; Yamaguchi K
    Rinsho Byori; 1994 Oct; 42(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 7996716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The application of antifoam silicones in the microbiological fermentation technic].
    Zalay L; Gebhardt I; Kiss I; Vághy T; Inczefi I
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig; 1965 Jul; 197(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 5324201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Practical ideas on the study of the sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics].
    Duval J
    Gaz Med Fr; 1965 May; 72(10):2065-90. PubMed ID: 5320108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative bacterial sensitivity: antibiotic gradients and probable in vivo response.
    Neal JD; Kite P
    J Med Lab Technol; 1969 Jan; 26(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 4898044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antibiotic susceptibility of preoperative normal conjunctival bacteria.
    Miño de Kaspar H; Koss MJ; He L; Blumenkranz MS; Ta CN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Apr; 139(4):730-3. PubMed ID: 15808182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [On a simple method for freeing pathological materials from fungi for the purpose of making bacterial antibiograms].
    Scoles E; Sisti F
    Rass Int Clin Ter; 1966 Dec; 46(24):1341-2. PubMed ID: 4872444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative activity of macrolide-glucoside antibiotics on recently isolated strains of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria "in vitro"].
    Periti P; Lamanna S; Nicoletti P; Orsi A
    G Ital Chemioter; 1982; 29 Suppl 1():33-7. PubMed ID: 6927119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A rational approach to the selection of an antimicrobial agent.
    Hirsh DC; Ruehl WW
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 185(10):1058-61. PubMed ID: 6392230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the E-test for determining antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
    Piérard D; De Meyer A; Rosseel P; Lauwers S
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1996 May; 44(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 8758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative studies of different methods for the determination of bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics].
    Popovici M; Alexenco E; Raicev V
    Microbiol Parazitol Epidemiol (Bucur); 1966; 11(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 5967203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Further comparative studies on the in vitro action of antiseptic agents and antibiotics on the bacterial flora in burn wounds].
    Bukowska D; Serafińska D; Zietkiewicz W
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1970 Nov; 25(48):1837-8. PubMed ID: 5491463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.