These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 532103)

  • 1. Infant visual acuity is underestimated because near threshold gratings are not preferentially fixated.
    Held R; Gwiazda J; Brill S; Mohindra I; Wolfe J
    Vision Res; 1979; 19(12):1377-9. PubMed ID: 532103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pattern thresholds for moving and stationary gratings during smooth eye movement.
    Murphy BJ
    Vision Res; 1978; 18(5):521-30. PubMed ID: 664333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superposition of edges and gratings: interaction between central and peripheral regions.
    Hauske G
    Vision Res; 1981; 21(3):373-84. PubMed ID: 7269316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to spatial phase.
    Burr DC
    Vision Res; 1980; 20(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 7414973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An inherent nonlinearity in near-threshold contrast detection.
    Swift DJ; Smith RA
    Vision Res; 1984; 24(9):977-8. PubMed ID: 6506485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction of pre- and postsaccadic patterns having the same coordinates in space.
    Wolf W; Hauske G; Lupp U
    Vision Res; 1980; 20(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 7434572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field.
    Robson JG; Graham N
    Vision Res; 1981; 21(3):409-18. PubMed ID: 7269319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pupil response as an objective measure of visual acuity.
    Barbur JL; Thomson WD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 3454921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vernier acuity in the cat: its relation to hyperacuity.
    Belleville S; Wilkinson F
    Vision Res; 1986; 26(8):1263-71. PubMed ID: 3798760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Summation and discrimination of gratings moving in opposite directions.
    Watson AB; Thompson PG; Murphy BJ; Nachmias J
    Vision Res; 1980; 20(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 7414966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of contrast and length of gratings on the visual evoked potential.
    Wright MJ; Johnston A
    Vision Res; 1982; 22(11):1389-99. PubMed ID: 7157677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infant grating acuity is temporally tuned.
    Sokol S; Moskowitz A; McCormack G; Augliere R
    Vision Res; 1988; 28(12):1357-66. PubMed ID: 3256153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A re-examination of contrast threshold difference between spatial sine-wave and square-wave gratings.
    Isono H
    Vision Res; 1979; 19(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 483590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision.
    Foley JM; Legge GE
    Vision Res; 1981; 21(7):1041-53. PubMed ID: 7314485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apparent fineness of briefly presented gratings: balance between movement and pattern channels.
    Kulikowski JJ
    Vision Res; 1975 Jun; 15(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 1138483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination at threshold: labelled detectors in human vision.
    Watson AB; Robson JG
    Vision Res; 1981; 21(7):1115-22. PubMed ID: 7314490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multiple-channel model for grating detection.
    Jaschinski-Kruza W; Cavonius CR
    Vision Res; 1984; 24(9):933-41. PubMed ID: 6506481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A noise masking experiment in grating perception at threshold: the implications on binocular summation.
    Braccini C; Gambardella G; Suetta G
    Vision Res; 1980; 20(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 7414971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vernier acuity with dot test objects.
    Beck J; Schwartz T
    Vision Res; 1979; 19(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 442553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of screen size and eccentricity on acuity estimates in infants using preferential looking.
    Atkinson J; Pimm-Smith E; Evans C; Braddick OJ
    Vision Res; 1983; 23(12):1479-83. PubMed ID: 6666048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.