These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 532129)
1. Safeguarding human rights in medical experiments. WHO Chron; 1979 Sep; 33(9):326-8. PubMed ID: 532129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical experimentation and the protection of human rights. World Federation of Associations of Clinical Toxicology Centers and Poison Control Centers Bull Med Leg Toxicol; 1979; 22(5):623-32. PubMed ID: 11661830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The strengths and weaknesses of university review committees to protect human rights. Dymond S Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1974 Aug; 55(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 4844661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bill of rights for research subjects. Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Experience of a human investigation committee in a Canadian medical school. Heughan C; Barrowman JA; Murphy TM; Stuart SR Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Apr; 130(8):991-6. PubMed ID: 6704862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ten ways to improve IRBs. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 429060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical issues in nursing research: access to human subjects. Scott DW Top Clin Nurs; 1982 Apr; 4(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11649725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical aspects of research involving elderly subjects: are we doing more than we say? Lane LW; Cassel CK; Bennett W J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):278-85; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 2131082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use? Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations. Bennett PB; Kylstra JA Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The report of the Advisory Research Committee on the ethics review of research involving human subjects. Queens Gazette; 1974 : 1-5, 30 Jan; 6(4) Suppl):. PubMed ID: 11663457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Baby Fae: the "anything goes" school of human experimentation. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Feb; 15(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 3884551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human experimentation and medical ethics. Gutteridge F Aust Nurses J; 1982 May; 11(10):23-5. PubMed ID: 11643895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Against special protections for medical students. Angoff NR IRB; 1985; 7(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role? Freedman B IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protection of human research subjects: are ethics necessary? Varley AB J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Feb; 4(2):23-6. PubMed ID: 1082480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do medical student research subjects need special protection? Christakis N IRB; 1985; 7(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]